Archlinux/Manjaro Versus Debian Thread
by openbsd98324 from LinuxQuestions.org on (#6GV8A)
Hello,
Archlinux/Manjaro Versus Debian Thread...
Archlinux/Manjaro is nice, more or less reliable, and quite okay.
Debian is a long tradition. It works.
However, I observed that numerous broken packages and errors occur in Manjaro/Archlinux. This is at cutting edge, but basically half things seem to work. The package manager is less reliable than apt-get, in sense that it takes long and it can lead to broken package/libs....
Debian well, everyone knows debian mostly.
It works more or less. Even systemd is more or less okay.
Tested:
armhf, aarch64, amd64, i386/686/(486) on debian
x86_64, aarch64 <- arch
Archlinux/Manjaro Versus Debian Thread...
Archlinux/Manjaro is nice, more or less reliable, and quite okay.
Debian is a long tradition. It works.
However, I observed that numerous broken packages and errors occur in Manjaro/Archlinux. This is at cutting edge, but basically half things seem to work. The package manager is less reliable than apt-get, in sense that it takes long and it can lead to broken package/libs....
Debian well, everyone knows debian mostly.
It works more or less. Even systemd is more or less okay.
Tested:
armhf, aarch64, amd64, i386/686/(486) on debian
x86_64, aarch64 <- arch