The Guardian view on stalemate in Ukraine: a more realistic approach is no bad thing | Editorial

Zelenskiy's government faces growing criticism at home and abroad. But support for Kyiv is not based on sentimentality

A year ago, Volodymyr Zelenskiy arrived in Washington as not merely the respected leader of a courageous nation, but as a global star. His address to Congress was greeted with thunderous cheers. As he returns for a third trip on Tuesday, he is seeking to win over key legislators, and the public, after Republican senators blocked $106bn in aid, primarily for Ukraine and also Israel. They have tied the spending to US immigration measures. The administration has warned that funding could run out by the end of the year. Kyiv is also trying to shore up support from its other main ally, the EU. In talks this week, Viktor Orban, the Hungarian prime minister, is threatening to veto 50bn of support and is blocking progress on accession.

The failure of Ukraine's counteroffensive has hit morale at home and enthusiasm for the cause abroad. Last month the commander in chief, Valerii Zaluzhnyi, acknowledged the stalemate and warned that there will most likely be no deep and beautiful breakthrough". This is now, more than ever, a war of attrition. GenZaluzhnyi's words demonstrated not only frustration but also the growing evidence of friction between political and military leaders. The US is also more openly discussing differences, primarily over military tactics, but also over issues such as corruption.