Take it from a neuroscientist: searching for a ‘male’ and ‘female’ brain is a waste of time | Gina Rippon

Arguments about sex differences in the brain have raged for centuries. As intriguing as they are, surely there are more urgent questions

There seems to be an insatiable public appetite for information about sex differences in the human brain, eagerly harnessed by the media in many forms. A paper out this week from a research group at Stanford University made headlines for its innovative contribution to this form: using an AI neural network model to look at brain scans to see if it could reliably" and robustly" tell female and male brains apart. In other - more neutral - words, could the algorithm tell whether the brain patterns being looked at were from women or men?

The answer was yes", though rather more guarded in the paper itself than in the reports about it. What was interesting about the study was that it seemed to have moved beyond the stereotypical size matters" agenda - asking whether male or female brains are bigger or smaller in different areas - instead measuring differences in the working brain using a method that looked at differences in blood flow to various brain regions.

Prof Gina Rippon is emeritus professor of cognitive neuroimaging at the Aston Brain Centre, Aston University, and the author of The Gendered Brain

Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.