The Guardian view on Iran and Israel: they need to step back from the brink of open warfare | Editorial

The world does not know what's been unleashed in the tit-for-tat attacks. But it is unlikely to be anything good

It is troubling that what started with Israel's attack on Iran's consular building in Syria on 1 April may not end with Tehran's Operation True Promise. The bombing in Damascus, which killed at least two top Iranian generals, resulted in the first-ever direct strikes launched against Israel from Iranian territory. For the Islamic regime, unpopular at home, crossing the Rubicon would have been very hard, if not impossible, to avoid. As British foreign secretary, David Cameron, admitted, the UK would take very strong action" if a hostile power had flattened one of its consulates.

This is a defining moment in the Middle East. The world does not know what's been unleashed here. But it is unlikely to be anything good. That is why it is right for world leaders to urge Benjamin Netanyahu's government to show restraint. The wise choice for Mr Netanyahu would be, in US president Joe Biden's words, to take the win" of having seen off the strikes and not respond militarily. Israel's prime minister could then turn his attention to the on-and-off talks with Hamas to free Israeli hostages and seek an end to the fighting in Gaza. Trading military restraint forinternational support might appeal to MrNetanyahu's opportunism.

Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.