Biden Signed The TikTok Ban. What’s Next For TikTok Users?

Editor's Note: This post was written before TikTok & ByteDance filed a lawsuit challenging the law this morning. So, while it says that no lawsuit has been filed, that's no longer the case. The rest of the article is still relevant, though. We'll have an analysis of the actual lawsuit later (probably tomorrow).

Over the last month, lawmakers moved swiftly to pass legislation that would effectively ban TikTok in the United States, eventually including itin a foreign aid packagethat was signed by President Biden. The impact of this legislation isn't entirely clear yet, but what is clear: whether TikTok is banned or sold to new owners, millions of people in the U.S. will no longer be able to get information and communicate with each other as they presently do.

What Happens Next?

At the moment, TikTok isn't banned." The law gives ByteDance 270 days to divest TikTok before the ban would take effect, which would be on January 19th, 2025. In the meantime, we expect courts to determine that the bill is unconstitutional. Though there is no lawsuit yet, one on behalf of TikTok itselfis imminent.

There are three possible outcomes. If the law is struck down,as it should be, nothing will change. If ByteDance divests TikTok by selling it, then the platform would still likely be usable. However, there's no telling whether the app's new owners would change its functionality, its algorithms, or other aspects of the company. As we've seen with other platforms, a change in ownership can result insignificant changesthat could impact its audience in unexpected ways. In fact, that's one of the given reasons to force the sale: so TikTok will serve different content to users, specifically when it comes to Chinese propaganda and misinformation. This is despite the fact that it has beenwell-established lawfor almost 60 years that U.S. people have a First Amendment right to receive foreign propaganda.

Lastly, if ByteDance refuses to sell, users in the U.S. will likely see it disappear from app stores sometime between now and that January 19, 2025 deadline.

How Will the Ban Be Implemented?

The law limits liability to intermediaries-entities that provide services to distribute, maintain, or update" TikTok by means of a marketplace, or that provide internet hosting services to enable the app's distribution, maintenance, or updating. The law also makes intermediaries responsible for its implementation.

The law explicitly denies to the Attorney General the authority to enforce it against an individual user of a foreign adversary controlled application, so users themselves cannot be held liable for continuing to use the application, if they can access it.

Will I Be Able to Download or Use TikTok If ByteDance Doesn't Sell?

It's possible some U.S. users will findroutes around the ban. But the vast majority will probably not, significantly shifting the platform's user base and content. If ByteDance itself assists in the distribution of the app, it could also be found liable, so even if U.S. users continue to use the platform, the company's ability to moderate and operate the app in the U.S. would likely be impacted. Bottom line: for a period of time after January 19, it's possible that the app would be usable, but it's unlikely to be the same platform-or even a very functional one in the U.S.-for very long.

Until now, the United States has championed the free flow of information around the world as a fundamental democratic principle and called out other nations when they have shut down internet access or banned social media apps and other online communications tools. In doing so, the U.S. has deemed restrictions on the free flow of information to be undemocratic. Enacting this legislation has undermined this long standing, democratic principle. It has alsounderminedthe U.S. government's moral authority to call out other nations for when they shut down internet access or ban social media apps and other online communications tools.

There are a few reasons legislators have given to ban TikTok. One is to change the type of content on the app-a clear First Amendment violation. The second is to protect data privacy. Our lawmakers should work to protect data privacy, but this was the wrong approach. They should prevent any company-regardless of where it is based-from collecting massive amounts of our detailed personal data, which is then made available to data brokers, U.S. government agencies, and even foreign adversaries. They should solve the real problem of out-of-control privacy invasions byenacting comprehensive consumer data privacy legislation. Instead, as happens far too often, our government's actions are vastly overreaching while also deeply underserving the public.

Originally published to the EFF Deeplinks blog.