With our futures at stake, Sunak and Starmer argued like managers of an imperilled golf club | Zoe Williams

Are you two the best we've got?' It was a harsh question but summed up last night's final leaders debate pretty well

Two cliches hovered over Wednesday night's TV debate between Keir Starmer and Rishi Sunak - the first that the stakes were high, the second that Sunak had nothing to lose and Starmer had everything to lose, since he was on course for a victory so resounding that its allegiances must be fragile. It's simply not possible for nearly 50% of the country to agree on one leader, the logic goes, so Sunak's job was to camp on Starmer's contradictions, and scare away the undecideds with talk of Labour's tax burden.

It makes sense on paper, but only in a world in which positive change is so unimaginable that the status quo represents safety and prosperity: all the audience questions suggested that it does not. Whatever their prescription, from closing the borders to making a better contract with young people, whether they were battling benefits sanctions or bankrupt local councils, the audience questioners were pretty unanimous on one point: everything's broken. So Starmer's job was to stick that broad-spectrum malaise on his Conservative opponent, and try to make sure none of it seeped out into a more generalised, will-sapping pessimism.