Harris clearly beat Trump – not that you’d know it from the rightwing media. Shame on them | Emma Brockes

From the likes of Fox News has come a masterclass in post-debate pretzel logic. Surely the excuses must run out soon

Short of sticking two pencils up his nose and muttering the word wibble", Trump's appearance on the debate stage on Tuesday night was never going to prove, decisively, to those on the fence, that he is unfit for high office. Unlike Biden's disastrous turn two and a half months ago, chaos is part of Trump's appeal - and if his thoughts are garbled, it signifies nothing beyond business as usual. And yet, even for Trump, aspects of his debate performance in Pennsylvania came so close to the edge on Tuesday that the next day what seemed most astonishing wasn't that Harris had performed so well but that so many apparently sentient human beings were still shilling for her unhinged opponent.

Heading into the encounter, one had the strangest sense both of the height of the stakes and also of the sheer entertainment value of the encounter. I found myself wondering about Harris's nerves - how a person handles them in such a unique situation. In the debate's opening moments, the vice-president did indeed seem nervous. But she settled, and about 15 minutes in, it started to happen: while Harris's keenly controlled anger rose to a point, Trump, mouth bunching, eyes disappearing into his head, unravelled.