The Wall Street Journal Applauds Republicans’ Corrupt, Illegal Theft Of Billions In Taxpayer Dollars

I've written repeatedly about how Republicanseffectively rewrote the 2021 infrastructure bill(they voted against) to ensure that billions of dollars in taxpayer-funded broadband grants (intended to be spent on affordable, next-generation fiber) was stolen from local communities, and instead given to Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos for expensive, congested satellite service.

I've also explained in detail why that's a problem: These networks may be initially cheaper to deploy, but the networkslack the capacity to actually scaleto meet demand. Data indicates theyharm astronomy researchand theozone layer. They're ultimately more expensive for consumers than fiber deployments, especially if those fiber deployments are by cooperatives or community owned.

In short, taxpayer money directed toward Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk is also money directed away from higher-capacity, faster, locally-owned (and usually cheaper) fiber and wireless alternatives. And it's money given to billionaires for technology they already had deployed or would have deployed anyway. It's a coordinated hijacking of taxpayer money that will actually undermine affordable internet access.

Enter the Wall Street Journal editorial board, which aggressively lies about all of this all of this in a new, comically terrible editorial. The headline starts with an outright lie about how Trump somehow unbroke the Internet":

How did Trump unbreak the internet?" Well again, he basically hijacked a huge chunk of the billions we planned to spend on next-generation fiber upgrades to schools, rural communities, and under-served areas, and gave it to Elon Musk for expensive satellite service he (again) already planned to deploy. This, according to the Wall Street Journal, is positively ingenious!

There's no need to spend money on affordable gigabit fiber, the Journal informs us, because existing wireless and satellite is simply good enough:

Congress appropriated $42 billion in the 2021 infrastructure bill for states to expand broadband to unserved" and rural communities. The spending was unnecessary since satellite services like SpaceX's Starlink and 5G fixed wireless services were rapidly closing the so-called digital divide. Upward of 99% of households already had high-speed internet."

Again, these services are expensive. They're congested. They're spotty. They're heavily monopolized by a handful of giant companies. They get slower as more people use them. Yes, you've technically connected the public," but you've done a piss poor job of it. Claiming it's unnecessary" to push fiber deeper in to more places shows the author is either lying or has no idea what they're talking about.

The Journal is particularly incensed that the original infrastructure bill actually bothered to consult with local states, communities, and tribes to best determine their needs. Positively outrageous!

States receiving funds had to consult with unions, native American tribes and local community organizations" on their plans to expand broadband. This gave liberal special interests a veto and let them extort developers."

Calling tribes Liberal special interests" is very weird and gross, but no matter. The Journal is also extremely upset that the original plan for your taxpayer money was to ensure that the resulting fiber access was affordable. Republicans have already destroyed those efforts, but the Journal is still, somehow, very mad about it months later:

Providers applying for funds were also advised to offer low-cost" plans and provide nondiscriminatory access to and use" of their networks on a wholesale basis to other providers . . . at just and reasonable wholesale." This was a back-door way to impose utility-style rate regulation on internet providers."

The Trump administration not only has gutted all broadband consumer protection at the FCC, and destroyed all efforts to make sure taxpayer-funded broadband is actually affordable, they've illegally threatened states that they'll lose already-awarded taxpayer money if they challenge the administration. This excites the very serious Wall Street Journal editorial board very much!

The real issue here is that the government engaged in some very light efforts to try and ensure broadband was affordable. This upsets regional telecom monopolies that have worked tirelessly to erode all local competition so they can rip you off. The idea that the government might come in and functionally prevent monopoly predation is unthinkable to these weirdos and Rupert Murdoch.

From here, the Wall Street Journal pushes a bunch of lies about how the corrupt Republican and Elon Musk hijacking of the program is saving taxpayers all sorts of money (several of the figures here are just foundationally incorrect):

The average cost for each new household or business connected in Louisiana fell to $3,943 from $5,245. Louisiana's most expensive project had run at $120,000 per connection under the Biden rules-almost as much as a starter home-but the Trump team brought the cost down to $7,547 per connection. Similar savings have occurred in other states."

Again, many communities were going to get high capacity, gigabit fiber, in some cases as low as $60-$70 a month. Instead, they're getting Elon Musk's Starlink broadband access, which is not only much slower (which also gets worse as more people use it), but costs also upwards of $120 a month (plus hundreds of dollars in up front hardware costs, and in some cases, congestion fees).

Yes, that technology is cheaper to deploy, and useful in areas with no access, but it's nowhere near as good as last mile" fiber right to your doorstop.

It's slower. It's more expensive to use. And the primary company benefitting it is run by an overt white supremacist. Again, this all very much excites the Wall Street Journal editorial board, but it's not going to be exciting to the millions of Americans who realize (hopefully) they got ripped off by a bunch of bullshitters three years from now.

Anyway, this is all to say that the Wall Street Journal is very excited that we redirected billions in taxpayer dollars away from affordable local fiber access and instead gave it to Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk for expensive, congested, satellite service that destroys the ozone layer, ruins astronomy, and isn't affordable for most of the Americans who actually need it:

The broadband program illustrates how the Biden combination of spending and regulation created market distortions and raised costs. It would be better if Congress let markets allocate capital, but the Trump Administration is ensuring taxpayer funds are spent in a more cost-effective way that does less economic harm."

That Republicans hijacked a promising program to thrown billions of taxpayer dollars at billionaires for inferior product will be clearly borne out by data in the years to come. At which point the authors of this Wall Street Journal editorial will either be dead or have moved on to lying about something else.