Article 72RMA NFL Wild Card INSTANT reactions: Bills are AFC favorites? Bears should be FEARED, where Eagles go from here

NFL Wild Card INSTANT reactions: Bills are AFC favorites? Bears should be FEARED, where Eagles go from here

by
Nate Tice,Matt Harmon
from on (#72RMA)
Subscribe to Football 301Apple Podcasts | Spotify | YouTube

Nate Tice & Matt Harmon give their instant reactions and takeaways from a very fun NFL Wild Card Weekend. The two hosts start with the New England Patriots taking care of business against the Los Angeles Chargers on Sunday night by blowing up Justin Herbert and the LA offense. Next up, the duo cover the San Francisco 49ers pulling off the upset against the Philadelphia Eagles (where does Philly go from here?) and the Buffalo Bills getting a huge win despite a valiant effort by the Jacksonville Jaguars.

Later, Nate & Matt recap the two Saturday games, as the Chicago Bears won a crazy one over the Green Bay Packers (should they make a coaching change?) and the Los Angeles Rams narrowly escaped what would've been a devastating loss to the Carolina Panthers.

(3:25) - Patriots beat Chargers

(20:50) - 49ers beat Eagles

(41:15) - Bills beat Jaguars

(58:50) - Bears beat Packers

(1:20:50) - Rams beat Panthers

0dfbdb70-ef5a-11f0-bed7-f76d259a7a1dJACKSONVILLE, FL - JANUARY 11: Josh Allen #17 of the Buffalo Bills celebrates a touchdown with Dawson Knox #88 of the Buffalo Bills during the AFC Wildcard Playoff game between the Jacksonville Jaguars and the Buffalo Bills on January 11, 2026 at EverBank Stadium in Jacksonville, Fl. (Photo by David Rosenblum/Icon Sportswire via Getty Images)(Photo by David Rosenblum/Icon Sportswire via Getty Images)

Watch thisfull episode on YouTube

Check out the rest of the Yahoo Sports podcast family at https://apple.co/3zEuTQj or at Yahoo Sports Podcasts

External Content
Source RSS or Atom Feed
Feed Location http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/rss.xml
Feed Title
Feed Link https://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/
Feed Copyright Copyright (c) 2026 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Reply 0 comments