Article 733TW Final 2025 ratings for the Panthers defense, per Pro Football Focus

Final 2025 ratings for the Panthers defense, per Pro Football Focus

by
from on (#733TW)
2fd784cdbe6d8e6f412a07bbb2e501c0

The good people at Pro Football Focus spend enormous amounts of time breaking down every player's performance on every individual play throughout the season. In the end, players can then be given a final rating somewhere between zero (poor) and 100 (elite).

If you want to learn more about PFF's methodology, you can read theirPlayer Grade overview.

Most of us as fans view PFF ratings this way:If the grade fits my opinion of a player then it's credible, but if the grade conflicts with my conclusions then PFF is stupid garbage and should never be trusted."I'm not advocating for PFF, rather I'm just providing one set of data that's at least interesting.

Here's how PFF graded and ranked the Panthers primary defensive players who played at least 300 snaps in 2025.

NamePOSGradePOS RankSnaps% Snaps
DIDerrick Brown72.918 of 13180876%
DIA'Shawn Robinson63.747 of 13165762%
DIBobby Brown56.773 of 13135133%
DITershawn Wharton43.0118 of 13140538%
EdgeNic Scourton68.052 of 12071768%
EdgeDJ Wonnum56.799 of 12068865%
LBTrevin Wallace54.264 of 8962459%
LBChristian Rozeboom48.475 of 8982378%
CBMike Jackson83.53 of 113104199%
CBJaycee Horn59.267 of 11395590%
CBChau Smith-Wade55.781 of 11362659%
STre'von Moehrig62.555 of 9699094%
SNick Scott62.357 of 96103598%
SLathan Ranson57.375 of 9633632%

For the most part, PFF didn't think much of the individual performance of Carolina's defensive players. Here are the highlights by position group:

Interior defensive line

Poor Derrick Brown. The guy is an absolute game wrecker in the middle of the line. Not only was he shamefully omitted from the Pro Bowl in 2025, PFF somehow graded him out as just the 18th best player at his position, meaning half of the teams in the NFL have a better interior defensive lineman than Derrick Brown. That's just crazy. If he played for a team that was on national television every other week (Kansas City Chiefs, Dallas Cowboys, Philadelphia Eagles, Buffalo Bills, etc.) he would be gushed over by the national media and in the conversation for All-Pro every year.

On the other end of the spectrum, PFF was pretty hard on Tershawn Wharton ranking him No. 118 of 131 players at his position. He was a big-money free agent signing before this season when the Panthers signed him to a 3-year, $45 million contract. He only appeared in nine games in his debut season in Carolina and hopefully he rebounds next year.

Edge rushers

The Panthers seemed to have found something in second-round rookie Nic Scourton. He had 47 tackles, seven tackles for loss, nine quarterback hits, and five sacks in his rookie campaign. He was a defensive mainstay playing 717 snaps and PFF ranked him No. 52 of 120 edge rushers, which is an outstanding result for a second-round rookie.

Linebackers

Not good. Moving on...

Cornerbacks

In the biggest shocker of all, Mike Jackson not had the single best PFF grade on the defense at 83.5, he graded out as the No. 3 corner in the entire NFL! I thought Jackson had a solid season, but an All-Pro season? Color me skeptical.

Any evaluation service that ranks Jaycee Horn as the No. 67 corner in the league should be laughed out of the room. The dude made the Pro Bowl this year, just as he did last year. Another whiff at cornerback for PFF.

Safeties

Both Tre'von Moehrig and Nick Scott graded out around league average for safeties despite both of them racking up more than 100 tackles. While neither of them were impact players who changed games for the Panthers, they were adequate on the back end and solid in run support. Moehrig even posted three sacks and seven quarterback hits on the season, so I think PFF underrated him a bit after a fairly solid season.

External Content
Source RSS or Atom Feed
Feed Location http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/rss.xml
Feed Title
Feed Link https://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/
Feed Copyright Copyright (c) 2026 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Reply 0 comments