Article 74AGQ Tighter bounds on alternating series remainder

Tighter bounds on alternating series remainder

by
John
from John D. Cook on (#74AGQ)

The alternating series test is part of the standard calculus curriculum. It says that if you truncate an alternating series, the remainder is bounded by the first term that was left out. This fact goes by in a blur for most students, but it becomes useful later if you need to do numerical computing.

To be more precise, assume we have a series of the form

villarino1.svg

where the ai are positive and monotonically converge to zero. Then the tail of the series is bounded by its first term:

villarino2.svg

The more we can say about the behavior of the ai the more we can say about the remainder. So far we've assumed that these terms go monotonically to zero. If their differences

villarino3.svg

also go monotonically to zero, then we have an upper and lower bound on the truncation error:

villarino4.svg

If the differences of the differences,

villarino5.svg

also converge monotonically to zero, we can get a larger lower bound and a smaller upper bound on the remainder. In general, if the differences up to order k of the ai go to zero monotonically, then the remainder term can be bounded as follows.

villarino6.svg

Source: Mark B. Villarino. The Error in an Alternating Series. American Mathematical Monthly, April 2018, pp. 360-364.

Related postsThe post Tighter bounds on alternating series remainder first appeared on John D. Cook.
External Content
Source RSS or Atom Feed
Feed Location http://feeds.feedburner.com/TheEndeavour?format=xml
Feed Title John D. Cook
Feed Link https://www.johndcook.com/blog
Reply 0 comments