Article 75589 Simple approximation for solving a right triangle

Simple approximation for solving a right triangle

by
John
from John D. Cook on (#75589)

Suppose you have a right triangle with sidesa,b, andc, wherea is the shortest side andc is the hypotenuse. Then the following approximation from [1] for the angle Aopposite side a seems too simple and too accurate to be true. In degrees,

A a 172 / (b + 2c).

The approximation above only involves simple arithmetic. No trig functions. Not even a square root. It could be carried out with pencil and paper or even mentally. And yet it is surprisingly accurate.

If we use the 3, 4, 5 triangle as an example, the exact value of the smallest angle is

A = arctan(3/4) * 180/ 36.8699

and the approximate value is

A 3 * 172 / (4 + 2*5) = 258/7 36.8571,

a difference of 0.0128. When the angle is more acute the approximation is even better.

Derivation

Where does this magical approximation come from? It boils down to the series

2 csc(x) + cot(x) = 3/x +x^3/60 +O(x4)

where x is in radians. When x is small, x^3/60 is extremely small and so we have

2 csc(x) + cot(x) 3/x.

Apply this approximation with csc(x) =c/a and cot(x) =b/a. and you have

x 3a/(b + 2c)

in radians. Multiply by 180/ to convert to degrees, and note that 540/ 172.

Discovery

It's unmotivated to say just expand 2 csc(x) + cot(x) in a series." Where didthat come from?

There's a line in [1] that says It can been seen, either from tables or from a consideration of power series that the radian measure of a small angle lies approximately one-third of the way from the sine to the tangent." In other words

3x 2 sin(x) + tan(x).

You can verify that by adding the power series and noting that the cubic terms cancel out.

But that's just the beginning. The author then makes the leap to conjecturing that if the weighted arithmetic mean gives a good approximation, maybe the weightedharmonic mean gives an even better approximation, and that leads to considering

2 csc(x) + cot(x) 3/x.

Extension

See the next post for an extension to oblique triangles. Not as simple, but based on the same trick.

[1] J. S. Frame. Solving a right triangle without tables. The American Mathematical Monthly, Vol. 50, No. 10 (Dec., 1943), pp. 622-626

The post Simple approximation for solving a right triangle first appeared on John D. Cook.
External Content
Source RSS or Atom Feed
Feed Location http://feeds.feedburner.com/TheEndeavour?format=xml
Feed Title John D. Cook
Feed Link https://www.johndcook.com/blog
Reply 0 comments