It depends (Score: 2, Insightful) by computermachine@pipedot.org on 2014-05-26 16:57 (#1WZ) Images are fine if they contribute to the story, but to use an image which is only vaguely related to the story seems unnessecary. Maybe images should be used when it makes sense to, and just have nothing otherwise.I voted none, but i am not against having images or icons. The great thing about having icons is that you are able to quickly notice the category of the story, which is great when you're scrolling through the page. Re: It depends (Score: 2, Insightful) by harmless@pipedot.org on 2014-05-28 00:25 (#1XP) Images are fine if they contribute to the storyExactly.And I just looked over the images currently on the main page, decided that most did not contribute at all and so removed them from the page. Much better.(Using the Quickstyle extension for Safari, if you want to know.) Re: It depends (Score: 1) by quadrox@pipedot.org on 2014-05-28 13:42 (#1Y0) I agree. I sort of understand the desire to have images, but really, it rarely adds anything of value to the story. I don't need any images, thank you!
Re: It depends (Score: 2, Insightful) by harmless@pipedot.org on 2014-05-28 00:25 (#1XP) Images are fine if they contribute to the storyExactly.And I just looked over the images currently on the main page, decided that most did not contribute at all and so removed them from the page. Much better.(Using the Quickstyle extension for Safari, if you want to know.) Re: It depends (Score: 1) by quadrox@pipedot.org on 2014-05-28 13:42 (#1Y0) I agree. I sort of understand the desire to have images, but really, it rarely adds anything of value to the story. I don't need any images, thank you!
Re: It depends (Score: 1) by quadrox@pipedot.org on 2014-05-28 13:42 (#1Y0) I agree. I sort of understand the desire to have images, but really, it rarely adds anything of value to the story. I don't need any images, thank you!