Comment 1Y5X6 Re: Secure vs. security

Story

Subgraph OS - Secure Linux Operating System for Non-Technical Users

Preview

Secure vs. security (Score: 2, Informative)

by fishybell@pipedot.org on 2016-10-13 23:45 (#1Y0XG)

The feature list listed here seems aimed at providing the user security, rather than offering a secure OS.

I don't doubt that they have added things to help with being secure — like the listed sandboxing — but none of the rest of the list really strikes me as being geared towards a secure, locked down, OS. When you throw in things like "advanced proxy settings" and "everything through TOR" and "mandatory full disk encryption" this all seems to be targeted at the paranoid rather than those who genuinely require security (web servers, mail servers, etc.).

As far as the paranoid go, sure, use it; it probably can't beat Tails though.

Re: Secure vs. security (Score: 0)

by Anonymous Coward on 2016-10-15 11:50 (#1Y5X6)

Time for a Tails vs Subgraph breakdown?

Junk Status

Marked as [Not Junk] by bryan@pipedot.org on 2017-06-12 21:27