Comment 1ZK Re: LUKS was a better alternative anyway

Story

TrueCrypt Project Problems

Preview

LUKS was a better alternative anyway (Score: 1)

by bryan@pipedot.org on 2014-05-30 22:42 (#1ZE)

LUKS encrypted file systems have been natively supported in most Linux distros for 5+ years. These encrypted file systems can be easily created on the command line or with a GUI tool like "gnome-disks". If you, for example, insert a thumb drive formated as a LUKS, the desktop environment pops up a password dialog to automatically mount the file system for you.

TrueCrypt mainly catered to Windows users. Also, the TrueCrypt license was incompatible with both the free-software and the Open Source Initiative philosophies.

Re: LUKS was a better alternative anyway (Score: 3, Insightful)

by fnj@pipedot.org on 2014-05-31 06:40 (#1ZK)

What LUKS doesn't give you is HIDDEN, deniable containers.

Moderation

Time Reason Points Voter
2014-06-01 01:03 Insightful +1 billshooterofbul@pipedot.org
2014-06-02 17:21 Informative +1 renevith@pipedot.org
2014-06-10 03:01 Normal 0 reziac@pipedot.org
2014-06-03 08:35 Normal 0 tdk@pipedot.org

Junk Status

Not marked as junk