Qt, not QT (Score: 3, Informative) by mth@pipedot.org on 2014-09-17 14:27 (#2SH3) It's written as "Qt". Otherwise people might confuse it with QuickTime. Re: Qt, not QT (Score: 1) by skarjak@pipedot.org on 2014-09-18 22:19 (#2SK5) But is it pronounced cutey or cute?The question of a lifetime. Re: Qt, not QT (Score: 1) by zafiro17@pipedot.org on 2014-09-19 09:57 (#2SKA) It's pronounced "Awesome." Love Qt. GTK+ can go jump off a cliff. Don't know why, but I've always preferred the look of Qt apps, even when KDE looked plasticky and Fisher-Pricey. But I'm a KDE fanboi, whaddaya expect?
Re: Qt, not QT (Score: 1) by skarjak@pipedot.org on 2014-09-18 22:19 (#2SK5) But is it pronounced cutey or cute?The question of a lifetime. Re: Qt, not QT (Score: 1) by zafiro17@pipedot.org on 2014-09-19 09:57 (#2SKA) It's pronounced "Awesome." Love Qt. GTK+ can go jump off a cliff. Don't know why, but I've always preferred the look of Qt apps, even when KDE looked plasticky and Fisher-Pricey. But I'm a KDE fanboi, whaddaya expect?
Re: Qt, not QT (Score: 1) by zafiro17@pipedot.org on 2014-09-19 09:57 (#2SKA) It's pronounced "Awesome." Love Qt. GTK+ can go jump off a cliff. Don't know why, but I've always preferred the look of Qt apps, even when KDE looked plasticky and Fisher-Pricey. But I'm a KDE fanboi, whaddaya expect?