ICANT (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on 2014-10-24 10:50 (#2TNT) Perhaps a name change is on the cards. The current system is preferable to some of the alternatives. Can you imagine a DNS administrated by China or the middle east? Re: ICANT (Score: 1) by zafiro17@pipedot.org on 2014-10-24 10:56 (#2TNX) Any self-respecting bureaucracy, if left unchecked, spends its time recommending added bureaucracy, patting itself on the back, and giving itself increases in salary. It's almost laughingly predictable. Let it go on for too long and you get the United Nations. The solution is oversight and reductions in budget. Bring down the hammer of thor, now! Re: ICANT (Score: 1) by tanuki64@pipedot.org on 2014-10-24 11:17 (#2TNZ) Hammer or not. IMHO the main problem of the ICANN is that there is no viable alternative.That's why I find http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Namecoin Namecoin so interesting. Though I must admit, that I didn't try any *coins myself, yet.
Re: ICANT (Score: 1) by zafiro17@pipedot.org on 2014-10-24 10:56 (#2TNX) Any self-respecting bureaucracy, if left unchecked, spends its time recommending added bureaucracy, patting itself on the back, and giving itself increases in salary. It's almost laughingly predictable. Let it go on for too long and you get the United Nations. The solution is oversight and reductions in budget. Bring down the hammer of thor, now! Re: ICANT (Score: 1) by tanuki64@pipedot.org on 2014-10-24 11:17 (#2TNZ) Hammer or not. IMHO the main problem of the ICANN is that there is no viable alternative.That's why I find http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Namecoin Namecoin so interesting. Though I must admit, that I didn't try any *coins myself, yet.
Re: ICANT (Score: 1) by tanuki64@pipedot.org on 2014-10-24 11:17 (#2TNZ) Hammer or not. IMHO the main problem of the ICANN is that there is no viable alternative.That's why I find http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Namecoin Namecoin so interesting. Though I must admit, that I didn't try any *coins myself, yet.