by Evan Ackerman on (#6QWS8)
IEEE Spectrum
Link | https://spectrum.ieee.org/ |
Feed | http://feeds.feedburner.com/IeeeSpectrum |
Updated | 2024-11-21 14:45 |
by Dina Genkina on (#6QWPN)
|
by Jeanna Matthews on (#6QVYA)
|
by Kohava Mendelsohn on (#6QVV1)
|
by Willie D. Jones on (#6QTNM)
|
by Evan Ackerman on (#6QTJQ)
|
by Tim Hornyak on (#6QTJR)
|
by Ashley Moran on (#6QT0X)
|
by Eliza Strickland on (#6QSXV)
|
by Matthew S. Smith on (#6QS00)
|
by Allison Marsh on (#6QS01)
|
by Samuel K. Moore on (#6QRA4)
|
by Joanna Goodrich on (#6QQX9)
|
by Tim Hornyak on (#6QQT4)
|
by Joanna Goodrich on (#6QQ9C)
|
by Khalifa University on (#6QQ9D)
|
by Evan Ackerman on (#6QQ6G)
|
by Willie D. Jones on (#6QP0E)
|
by Dina Genkina on (#6QN2W)
|
by Marcus Carter on (#6QM5V)
|
by Elizabeth Fuscaldo on (#6QKJN)
|
by Eliza Strickland on (#6QK8S)
|
by Dan Steingart on (#6QJKZ)
|
by IEEE on (#6QHHC)
|
by Evan Ackerman on (#6QHEQ)
|
by Payal Arora on (#6QGGD)
|
by IEEE Member and Geographic Activities on (#6QFQE)
|
by Peter Fairley on (#6QEG9)
|
by Glenn Zorpette on (#6QDVH)
|
by Tom Coughlin on (#6QD97)
|
by Eliza Strickland on (#6QCQ9)
|
by David Evan Harris on (#6QCEG)
|
by IEEE Spectrum on (#6QC7C)
At ICRA 2024, Spectrum editor Evan Ackerman sat down with Unitree founder and CEO Xingxing Wang and Tony Yang, VP of Business Development, to talk about the company's newest humanoid, the G1 model.Smaller, more flexible, and elegant, the G1 robot is designed for general use in service and industry, and is one of the cheapest-if not the cheapest-humanoid around.
|
by Evan Ackerman on (#6QC7D)
|
by Adrienne Hahn on (#6QBBS)
by Alan Boris on (#6QB91)
|
by Evan Ackerman on (#6QB2Z)
|
by Dina Genkina on (#6QAAW)
|
by Margo Anderson on (#6QA1Z)
by Kumar Singirikonda on (#6Q9G4)
|
by Andrew Jones on (#6Q9AD)
|
by Harry Goldstein on (#6Q8NZ)
|
by Edd Gent on (#6Q8KV)
|
by Willie D. Jones on (#6Q7RA)
|
by Willie D. Jones on (#6Q78M)
|
by Evan Ackerman on (#6Q6VS)
|
by Willie D. Jones on (#6Q5X0)
|
by Stephen Cass on (#6Q5PW)
In our goal of trying to estimate a programming language's popularity, we realized that no one can look over the shoulder of every person writing code, whether that be a child writing a Java script for a personal Minecraft server, a mobile app developer hoping to hit it big, or an aerospace engineer writing mission-critical code for a voyage to Mars. Our Top Programming Languages interactive tries to tackle the problem of estimating a language's popularity by looking for proxy signals.We do this by constructing measures of popularity from a variety of data sources that we believe are good proxies for active interest for each programming language. In total, we identify 63 programming languages. We then weight each data source to create an overall index of popularity, excluding some of the lowest scorers. Below, we describe the sources of data we use to get the measures, and the weighting scheme we use to produce the overall indices.By popularity, we mean we are trying to rank languages that are in active use. We look at three different aspects of popularity: languages in active use among typical IEEE members and working software engineers (the Spectrum" ranking), languages that are in demand by employers (the Jobs" ranking), and languages that are in the zeitgeist (the Trending" ranking).We gauged the popularity of languages using the following sources for a total of eight metrics (see below). We gathered the information for all metrics in July-August 2024. The data were gathered manually to avoid results being biased due to API changes or terminations and because many of the programming language's names (C++, Scheme) collided with common terms found in research papers and job ads or were difficult for a search engine to parse. When a large number of search results made it impractical to resolve ambiguities by examining all of the results individually, we used a sample of each data source, and determined the relevant sample size based on estimating the true mean with 95 percent confidence. Not all data sources contain information for each programming language and we interpret this information as the programming language having no hits" (that is, not being popular).The results from each metric are normalized to produce a relative popularity score between 0 and 1. Then the individual metrics are multiplied by a weight factor, combined, and the result renormalized to produce an aggregate popularity score.In aggregating metrics, we hope to compensate for statistical quirks that might distort a language's popularity score in any particular source of data. Varying the weight factors allows us to create the different results for the Spectrum, Jobs, and Trending rankings. We fully acknowledge that, while these weights are subjective, they are based on our understanding of the sources and our prior coverage of software topics. Varying the weight factors allows us to emphasize different types of popularity and produce the different rankings. We then combined each weighted data source for each program and then renormalized the resulting frequency to produce an aggregate popularity score.The Top Programming Languages was originally created by data journalist Nick Diakopoulos. Our statistical methodology advisor is Hilary Wething. Research assistance was provided by Elizabeth Wood. Rankings are computed using R.GoogleGoogle is the leading search engine in the world, making it an ideal fit for estimating language popularity. We measured the number of hits for each language by searching on the template, X programming language" (with quotation marks) and manually recorded the number of results that were returned by the search. We took the measurement in July 2024. We like this measure because it indicates the volume of online information resources about each programming language.Stack OverflowStack Overflow is a popular site where programmers can ask questions about coding. We recorded the number of questions tagged to each program within the last week prior to our search (August 2024). For the Mathematica/Wolfram language, we relied on the sister Stack" for the Mathematica platform and tallied the number of programming-related questions asked in the past week. These data were gathered manually. This measure indicates what programming languages are currently trending.IEEE Xplore Digital LibraryIEEE maintains a digital library with millions of conference and journal articles covering a wide array of scientific and engineering disciplines. We searched for articles that mention each of the languages in the template X programming" for the years 2023 and 2024, because this is the smallest timeframe for which we could access articles. For search results that returned thousands of articles, we identified the correct sample size for a 95 percent confidence interval (usually a little over 300) and pulled that number of articles. For each language we sampled, we identified the share of articles that utilize the programming language and then multiplied the total number of articles by this share to tally the likely total number of articles that reference a given programming language. We conducted this search in July 2024. This metric captures the prevalence of the different programming languages as used and referenced in engineering scholarship.IEEE Job SiteWe measured the demand for different programming languages in job postings on the IEEE Job Site. For search results that returned thousands of listings, we identified the correct sample size for a 95 percent confidence interval (usually around 300 results) and pulled that number of job listings to manually examine. For each language we sampled, we identified the share of listings that utilize the programming language and then multiplied the total number of job listings by this share to tally the likely total number of job listings that reference a given programming language. Additionally, because some of the languages we track could be ambiguous in plain text-such as lD, Go, J, Ada, and R-we searched for job postings with those words in the job description and then manually examined the results, again sampling entries if the number of results was large. The search was conducted in July 2024. We like the IEEE Job Site for its large number of non-U.S. listings, making it an ideal to measure global popularity.CareerBuilderWe measured the demand for different programming languages on the CareerBuilder job site. We searched for Developer" jobs offered within the United States, as this is the most popular job title for programmers. We sampled 400 job ads and manually examined them to identify which languages employers mentioned in the postings. The search was conducted in July 2024. We like the career builder site to identify the popularity of programmer jobs in the United States.GitHub
by Stephen Cass on (#6Q5PX)
|