by Thom Holwerda on (#75FMP)
On the Fedora forums, there's a long-running thread about a proposal for Fedora to build a variant of the distribution aimed specifically at AI". The problem" identified in the proposal is that setting up the various parts that a developer in the AI" space needs is currently quite difficult on Fedora, and as such, a bunch of technical steps need to be taken to make this easier. Setting aside the AI" of the proposal and ensuing discussion, it's actually a very interesting read, going deep into the weeds about consequential questions like building an LTS kernel on Fedora, support for out-of-tree kernel mods, and a lot more. To spoil the ending: the proposal has already been approved unanimously by the Fedora Council, meaning the efforts laid out in the proposal will be undertaken. This means that, depending on progress, we'll see a Fedora AI" Desktop or whatever it's going to be called somewhere in the timeframe from Fedora 45 to Fedora 47. As a Fedora user on all my machines, I'm obviously not too happy about this, since I'd much rather the scarce resources of a project like Fedora goes towards things not as ethically bankrupt, environmentally destructive, and artistically deficient as AI", but in the end it's a project owned and controlled by IBM, so it's not exactly unexpected. What really surprised me in this entire discussion is a post by Fedora Project Leader Jef Spaleta, responding to worries people in the thread were having about such a big AI" undertaking under the Fedora branding causing serious reputational damage to Fedora as a whole. These concerns are clearly valid, as people really fucking hate AI", doubly so in the open source community whose work especially AI" coding tools are built on without any form of consent. As such, Fedora undertaking a big AI" desktop project is bound to have a negative impact on Fedora's image. Just look at what aggressively pushing Copilot has done to Windows 11's already shit reputation. Spaleta, however, just doesn't care. Literally. As the Fedora Project Leader, I am absolutely not concerned about the reputational damage to this project that comes with setting up an entirely new output attractive to developers who want to make use of Ai tools. Jef Spaleta I've been looking at this line on and off for a few days now, and I just can't wrap my head around how the leader of an open source project built on and relying on the free labour of thousands of contributors says he doesn't care about reputational damage to the project he's leading. Effective and capable open source contributors are not exactly a commodity, and a lot of the decisions they make about what projects to donate their time to are based on vibes and personal convictions - you can't really pay them to look the other way. Saying you don't care about reputational damage to your huge open source project seems rather shortsighted, but of course, I don't lead a huge open source project so what do I know? In the linked thread alone, one long-time Fedora contributor, Fernando Mancera, already decided to leave the project on the spot, and I have a sneaking suspicion he won't be the last. AI" is a deeply tainted hype on many levels, and the more you try to chase this dragon, the more capable people you'll end up chasing away.