SoylentNews

Arthur T Knackerbracket has processed the following story:

fliptop writes:Surprise surprise, we've done it again. We've demonstrated an ability to compromise significantly sensitive networks, including governments, militaries, space agencies, cyber security companies, supply chains, software development systems and environments, and more:

Arthur T Knackerbracket has processed the following story:

taylorvich writes:https://phys.org/news/2025-02-earth-core-solid-previously-thought.html

Critics accuse the company of wielding outsized private influence on public policing

day of the dalek writes:NASCAR's first points race of 2025 is the Daytona 500, which is on February 16. The Daytona 500 is NASCAR's most prestigious race, with a unique style of racing known as pack racing. This is characterized by many cars running at very high speeds in large packs, and often massive wrecks referred to as the "Big One". However, many drivers and fans have been critical of rules changes in recent years leading to racing at NASCAR's biggest oval tracks that they describe as boring.Bobby Allison's 210 mph crash at the 1987 Winston 500 forever changed how NASCAR races at superspeedways. Allison's car became airborne, severely damaged the catch fence along the frontstretch at Talladega, and almost flew into the stands. NASCAR decided the speeds had become too fast at their two largest and highest-banked ovals, Daytona and Talladega, and implemented restrictor plates at those tracks starting in 1988. Restrictor plates reduce the air intake into the engine, reducing both horsepower and speeds.Although drafting had always been powerful at superspeedways, the changes caused the cars to race in large packs, often with 20 or 30 cars within a couple seconds of each other. Although NASCAR says that this is necessary to prevent the worst wrecks, often leads to large multi-car wrecks. Drivers also complain that winning restrictor plate races is influenced too heavily by luck, though this is disputed.When a car drives forward, it displaces the air with its nose, creating high pressure at the front of the car, and low pressure behind the car in its turbulent wake. The combination of high pressure in front and low pressure behind the car creates a rearward pointing pressure gradient force (PGF), which is drag and slows the car down. If another car rides in the wake of the lead car, it experiences lower pressure on its nose, reducing the drag and allowing the car to go faster. However, if the trailing car puts its nose right behind the rear bumper of the lead car, it increases the pressure behind the lead car, reducing the lead car's drag as well. When the cars are in close proximity, both leading and trailing cars benefit from the draft When NASCAR reduced the horsepower at superspeedways, the draft became particularly powerful, and the fastest way around the track was now in a group of cars driving bumper-to-bumper.The result is often a large pack of cars, two or three wide, driving around the track at full throttle with speeds around 190 mph. One of the best ways to pass in pack racing is for a car to back up to the bumper of the car behind it, get pushed forward to increase its speed, and then get out of line to try to move forward. For this strategy to work, either that car has to get back in the draft soon before drag slows it down too much, or it needs other cars to also get out of line and start a new line. The result is a style of racing that leads to cars making aggressive moves at high speeds, and it can be spectacular to watch. However, in recent years and especially since the introduction of NASCAR's next-gen Cup Series car in 2022, the racing at superspeedways has been criticized as boring.Although it's difficult to find detailed historical engine specs, for much of the restrictor plate era, cars might have 750 horsepower at most tracks but be limited to 450 horsepower at superspeedways. More recently, NASCAR has been increasing the power at superspeedways while adding more aerodynamic drag to slow the cars down. However, this means the drag is more severe when a car gets out of line, and a single car will drop back quickly. This makes it much more difficult for cars to pass without multiple cars getting out of line at once.Driver Denny Hamlin also said that higher drag in the next-gen car leads to poorer fuel mileage, leading to slower speeds to conserve fuel, and less passing. Instead of making aggressive moves to pass, cars tend to ride around in line for much of the race leading to a style of racing that many describe as boring. Suggestions to improve the racing include reducing drag, lowering horsepower in the engines, and either adjusting the lengths of race stages or eliminating stage racing altogether at superspeedways.Original SubmissionRead more of this story at SoylentNews.

taylorvich writes:https://phys.org/news/2025-02-money-distance-theory.html

upstart writes:WikiTok cures boredom in spare moments with wholesome swipe-up Wikipedia article discovery:

day of the dalek writes:Tornado strength is rated from 0 (weakest) to 5 (strongest) on the Enhanced Fujita (EF) scale, with roughly 2% of tornadoes being rated EF4 or EF5. The EF scale replaced the older Fujita scale to provide much more fine-grained detail in determining a tornado's rating. The EF5 rating corresponds to estimated peak winds of 200+ mph. However, it is purely a damage scale, from which the peak winds in the tornado are later estimated. Although meteorologists often discuss the wind speeds in tornadoes, measured wind speeds are never a factor in rating tornadoes.This distinction was made apparent on April 26, 1991 when the Andover, Kansas tornado was rated F5 while the Red Rock, Oklahoma tornado was rated F4 despite likely being the stronger tornado. A mobile radar from the University of Oklahoma measured 270+ mph winds in the Red Rock tornado, well into the F5 range, and the strongest tornado winds that had ever been measured to date. However, because the Red Rock tornado remained over mostly rural areas unlike the Andover tornado, there was little opportunity for it to do severe enough damage to be rated F5. This distinction remains true with the EF scale, where the 2013 El Reno, Oklahoma tornado was originally rated EF5 on the basis of mobile radar observations, then downgraded to EF3 based on the lack of EF4 or EF5 damage in damage surveys.A new article in the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society discusses the current "drought" in EF5 tornadoes, with that rating being most recently assigned to the 2013 Moore, Oklahoma tornado that happened just 11 days before the 2013 El Reno tornado. The lack of EF5 tornadoes for over 11 years has raised questions of why, and if the EF5 rating is essentially obsolete.The journal paper argues that the lack of EF5 tornadoes for 11 years is roughly 0.3%, and it's very unlikely that there have been zero EF5 tornadoes during that period. Instead, it's probable that this is due to stricter application of the EF scale standards, and several tornadoes were estimated to have peak winds of 190+ mph during that period. If those tornadoes were reclassified to EF5, it would be statistically consistent with the previous climatology of EF5 tornadoes. The authors note that some of the previous EF5 ratings such as the 2011 Joplin Missouri tornado were based on damage indicators that were not part of the EF scale specifications.One of the biggest reasons for not assigning an EF5 rating is the presence of areas with limited damage very close to near-total devastation. However, the strongest tornadoes are generally multi-vortex tornadoes, where the strongest winds are found within small vortices embedded within a broader tornadic circulation. This could explain the proximity of extreme damage to areas with much less damage. The damage severity also depends on how long structures are exposed to extreme winds, an example of which is the 1997 Jarrell, Texas tornado, which was rated F5 but damage was more severe due to the tornado moving slowly and exposing buildings to the tornado winds for a longer than usual time. This raises the question of whether the EF5 rating is obsolete based on how the EF scale is currently applied, and if it's time to again revise how meteorologists rate tornado strength.Original SubmissionRead more of this story at SoylentNews.

taylorvich writes:https://spectrum.ieee.org/aluminum-battery

upstart writes:AI increases unemployment rates in US IT sector:

The Beeb decided to test some LLMs to see how well they could summarize the news https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0m17d8827ko Turns out the answer is, "not very well".

Arthur T Knackerbracket has processed the following story:

RamiK writes:

upstart writes:Handful of users claim new Nvidia GPUs are melting power cables again:

upstart writes:Boeing has informed its employees of uncertainty in future SLS contracts:

Arthur T Knackerbracket has processed the following story:

[Rescheduled to keep it visible--JR]IntroductionFor most people the holiday season is over. There are a few who have their winter holidays booked as we still have a few months of the skiing season to go yet, but I don't think that this affects any of our staff! So I offer a belated 'Happy New Year' and wish you all the very best for 2025.Volunteers for the BoardSlightly less than 12 months ago I asked for volunteers to serve on the Board of SoylentNews and fortunately some people stepped forward and took on the 3 key roles (Chairman, Treasurer and Secretary). They have each contributed to the setting up of the site and getting us where we are today. However, they will soon be wanting to stand down from their current posts. The concept of the site is that the governance is provided by the community and that posts should be rotated occasionally. We are again seeking volunteers to assume one of the current positions. The roles are important, they are the most important posts on the site because without them there can be no site, but I don't think that they are particularly arduous. They are not roles that require a daily or even a weekly input. They maintain an overview of the site and they have an independent decision-making role in future site operations.Volunteers for the posts should remember that they must be prepared to sign site legal business documents and therefore cannot maintain perfect anonymity. On the site we have not given any additional information other than their nicknames and user ids. Nevertheless, somewhere in the masses of paperwork and records that the US demands and maintains their names and contact details are recorded.If you wish to volunteer for a post then you should have an account in good standing i.e. not banned or created within the last few months, and with a reasonable level of karma. Please volunteer either here in the comments or directly via email to admin@soylentnews.org. If you have volunteered for a post previously then it does not preclude you from volunteering again. If you have questions regarding a role then please raise them here. If appropriate, I will ask the person currently in that post to reply so that you get the information direct from 'the horses mouth'.Once we have a volunteer or volunteers for a post we will hold an election for the community to approve and select a person for a post. This will be done openly and everyone with an active account created before the date and time that this Meta is published will have a single vote. The reason for this restriction is to prevent a mass of new accounts attempting to unfairly influence the outcome of the vote. The current Board will make the final decision on who is chosen.Read more of this story at SoylentNews.

Arthur T Knackerbracket has processed the following story:

Arthur T Knackerbracket has processed the following story:

upstart writes:Intel has already received $2.2B in federal grants for chip production:

Arthur T Knackerbracket has processed the following story:

Arthur T Knackerbracket has processed the following story:

fliptop writes:It might be the first time this type of stealer has cracked iPhones:

owl writes:https://chiraaggohel.com/posts/llms-eda/

fliptop writes:Messaging app said it had 'high confidence' some users were targeted and 'possibly compromised' by Paragon Solutions spyware:

looorg writes:https://torrentfreak.com/meta-torrented-over-81-tb-of-data-through-annas-archive-despite-few-seeders-250206/Facebook/Meta torrented over 81+TB of books/data to feed their models. Odd that the law isn't pounding on their door or they have some kind of strikes to get disconnected from the internet. Zuck likes his torrents and pirated books ...

Arthur T Knackerbracket has processed the following story:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2025/02/07/apple-encryption-backdoor-uk/ [Paywalled]"Security officials in the United Kingdom have demanded that Apple create a back door allowing them to retrieve all the content any Apple user worldwide has uploaded to the cloud, people familiar with the matter told The Washington Post."The British government's undisclosed order, issued last month, requires blanket capability to view fully encrypted material, not merely assistance in cracking a specific account, and has no known precedent in major democracies. Its application would mark a significant defeat for tech companies in their decades-long battle to avoid being wielded as government tools against their users, the people said, speaking under the condition of anonymity to discuss legally and politically sensitive issues."From the BBC:

owl writes:http://www.neocomputer.org/projects/et/

Arthur T Knackerbracket has processed the following story:

owl writes:https://www.sciencealert.com/mysterious-radiation-belts-detected-around-earth-after-epic-solar-storm

upstart writes:This year will decide if Horizon Worlds "will go down as the work of visionaries or a legendary misadventure," according to a Meta executive:

Arthur T Knackerbracket has processed the following story:

digitalaudiorock writes:For what is apparently the fifth time in recent years, changes to the Cloudflare browser integrity check are blocking the Palemoon browser as well as other non-mainstream browsers from any sites that use it. Every time this has happened before it's taken at least two weeks for them to address it. This one has gone on for a week and Cloudflare has yet to even acknowledge it. Here's the original post on the Palemoon forum:https://forum.palemoon.org/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=32045The following post was then made on the Cloudflare community forum. Oddly, the thread was apparently closed because forum users flagged it as spam. It's pretty clear that these were pro-Cloudflare trolls on the forum that Cloudflare themselves is apparently OK with...likely because they troll on Cloudflare's side:https://community.cloudflare.com/t/access-denied-to-pale-moon-desktop-browser/764330This was later started on Hacker News:https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42953508It's bad enough that many sites get coded so as to only work on mainstream browsers. However it's a much bigger issue when a company that's becoming the gateway to the web does so. In addition to the countless things that are wrong with this, I also agree with this post from user "Deadgye" on the Palemoon forum, making a case for false advertising on their part:https://forum.palemoon.org/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=32045&start=100#p259382The cynic in me wonders if every time I get blocked from a site, I might be doing a $blocked_bots++ to some statistics Clouldflare may brag about.Original SubmissionRead more of this story at SoylentNews.

TheReaperD writes:News of mass immigration arrests has swept across the US over the past couple of weeks. Reports from Massachusetts to Idaho have described agents from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice) spreading through communities and rounding people up. Quick Google searches for Ice operations, raids and arrests return a deluge of government press releases. Headlines include "ICE arrests 85 during 4-day Colorado operation", "New Orleans focuses targeted operations on 123 criminal noncitizens", and in Wisconsin, "ICE arrests 83 criminal aliens".But The Guardian took a closer look at these Ice reports tells a different story.All the archived Ice press releases soaring to the top of Google search results were marked with the same timestamp and read: "Updated: 01/24/2025".So, it looks like rather than actually doing any immigration raids, they're simply changing the timestamps on [some] raids dating back to 2008 to claim credit again for raids they did long [ago]. Once again, hype over substance.Original SubmissionRead more of this story at SoylentNews.

upstart writes:Piecing together the puzzle of the world's earliest datable rune stone:

upstart writes:Deepfake videos are getting shockingly good:

Freeman, and an Anonymous Coward submitted the same story:As Internet enshittification marches on, here are some of the worst offenders:

upstart writes:Russia VPN Crackdown Revelation - VPN Sites Hide Their IP Addresses:

AnonTechie writes:

Frosty Piss writes:https://techcrunch.com/2025/02/04/google-removes-pledge-to-not-use-ai-for-weapons-from-website/

upstart writes:Warmer, More Crowded Cities Bring Out the Rats:

day of the dalek writes:Eagles or Chiefs? Who's your pick to win the Super Bowl?Anyone can make a guess, but can we predict the winner with some skill? At first glance, the Eagles were 14-3 during the regular season, but the Chiefs had a slightly better record at 15-2. Therefore, we should pick the Chiefs, right? As college football commentator Lee Corso would say, not so fast, my friend.A game like chess has no luck at all. You might say you got lucky if your opponent made a poor decision, but that's really just human error. When I make a move like to castle kingside, that move always happens in the exact same way, with no luck involved. In football, however, there's a lot of random chance. A gust of wind might blow a field goal wide right, or a receiver might slip on a slick field and miss an otherwise easy pass. Or the officials might miss a call due to their own human error. Research shows that there's a lot of luck in football, and it doesn't always even out over a 16 or 17 game season. If we want to predict the outcome of future games skillfully, we need a way to distinguish lucky teams from good teams.The most accurate prediction systems rely heavily on margin of victory instead of a team's won-loss record. If the quarterback throws a pass to a wide open receiver, but the receiver slips on a slick field and doesn't catch the pass, it might prevent the team from scoring a touchdown on that drive. Luck might cost the team a touchdown, but it's a lot less likely for bad luck to cost that team two or three touchdowns. When teams win or lose games by larger margins, they're more insulated from the effects of luck. A team that wins a lot of close games might well be getting lucky, but a team that's blowing out their opponents is probably just a really good team. Strength of schedule also matters. If a team is winning a lot of blowout games but against lesser competition, they're probably not as good as their record or margins of victory might suggest.Another factor is the pace of play. A team that plays quickly is going to run more plays during a game, and that will also result in more scoring. A good team that plays quickly will probably win by larger margins, but a bad team with a rapid tempo is going to lose by larger margins. Many good prediction systems also take this into account, as well as that teams also tend to perform slightly better when they're at home than on the road.During the regular season, the Chiefs outscored their opponents by a total of 59 points, but the Eagles had a much larger scoring margin of 160 points. But what about their schedules?Two of the best rating systems are ESPN's Football Power Index (FPI) and Jeff Sagarin's ratings. FPI shows that the Chiefs played the 20th toughest schedule, compared to the Eagles with the 23rd strongest schedule. Sagarin also has the Chiefs' schedule at #20, but the Eagles at #30. According to Sagarin, the average Chiefs opponent was 0.97 points tougher than the average Eagles opponent. Over the course of the season, this is worth about 16.49 points. If the Eagles played the same schedule as the Chiefs, we would expect the Chiefs to have a scoring margin of 75.49 points. That's a little better, but still not nearly as good as the Eagles.The advanced metrics generally agree that the Eagles are the better team. If we subtract their FPI ratings, we would expect the Eagles to be favored by 2.1 points. Sagarin's ratings suggest Eagles by 4.08. On paper, the advanced metrics say the Eagles have a small edge over the Chiefs. But those predictions are actually the mean (or very close to it) of a statistical distribution of possible outcomes. FPI favors the Eagles by 2.1, but gives them a 56.1% chance of winning. Although we can predict football games with some skill, this is why we still have to play the games.Original SubmissionRead more of this story at SoylentNews.

upstart writes:Google offering 'voluntary exit' for employees working on Pixel, Android:

taylorvich writes:https://physics.aps.org/articles/v18/22

Arthur T Knackerbracket has processed the following story:

upstart writes:Giant Study Questions Link Between Autism and Maternal Health:

hubie writes:Everyone knows your location: tracking myself down through in-app ads:

Arthur T Knackerbracket has processed the following story: