There appears to have been a problem with the update of the Poll. Some made comments before the Poll appeared on the front pages - or so it seems. How they accessed it I do not know. The Poll released at the programmed time but comments that had already been made seem to have been lost. I am investigating the cause.My apologies to anyone who had already made a comment. All I can do is ask that you make your comments again. We have not seen the problem before so if anyone can provide additional information that might help in identifying the cause it would be most useful. Did you access the Poll via the front page? If not, can you explain how you did access it please? Which browser are you using? Did anything appear 'different' to when you usually access the site?[Addendum: The poll displayed on my front page has reverted to the previous poll again. If anyone else has seen the same please confirm in a reply to this Meta.] After a minute or so it returned to displaying the correct Poll.Read more of this story at SoylentNews.
kolie writes:https://techcrunch.com/2025/04/03/intel-and-tsmc-are-reportedly-launching-a-joint-chipmaking-venture/In a significant move, Intel and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) are reportedly teaming up to create a joint chipmaking venture. This collaboration aims to enhance semiconductor production capabilities and foster innovation in the semiconductor industry. The joint venture is poised to have a substantial impact on the global tech market.
aliks writes:According to journalism.co.uk an Ethics Box added to a news article aims to explain the editorial thinking behind key decisions on the news story.The aim being to counter increasing mistrust amongst youth who are skeptical of journalism in general.
aliks writes:In the spirit of making a submission a week - I had a look at the front page of phys.orgThe article:https://phys.org/news/2025-03-class-zwitterionic-phospholipids-mrna-delivery.htmlimmediately caught my eye. Are we letting the biochemists get ahead of cyber geeks in the battle for the wierdest jargon?We must fight back!Although zwitterions do have a bit of history behind them: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZwitterionOriginal SubmissionRead more of this story at SoylentNews.
canopic jug writes:The cryptographer who blogs under the pseudonym Soatok has written an in depth discussion of the practical limitations of End-to-End Encryption on his blog. For some things, such as planning military strikes, Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility (SCIFs) are the right tool for the job, while smartphone apps of any stripe are not.
oregonjohn writes:We are entering a new phase of developing Soylent News. I'm John and I am the president of the nonprofit board of Soylent Phoenix, which manages Soylent News.Soon we'll be asking you to review, suggest, and comment on our proposals for a variety of organizational and management changes that we hope will build our community and that will make the site more useful and friendly without changing the intent and basic design.More coming soon so keep an eye out for updates. Your input is essential.https://soylentnews.org/faq.plJohnOriginal SubmissionRead more of this story at SoylentNews.
canopic jug writes:Developer Dave Grauer has a long blog post about the broligarchs of Silicon Valley where he asks how they became the face of "technology" and examines how that came to be and what can be done to correct the error.
An Anonymous Coward writes:A very pretty and detailed Tor Network Status (Onion link) page, listing node by node and type for each.This is an unofficial current list.For official lists and more info, visit:https://consensus-health.torproject.org/
fliptop writes:The popular and original mainstream illegal music file-sharing platform that caused absolute mayhem for record labels in the early 2000s was sold to tech company Infinite Reality on Tuesday for a whopping $200+ million figure, as the startup said that it hopes of transform [sic] the streaming service into a music Metaverse of sorts:
canopic jug writes:Software engineer, Alex Gaynor has made an analysis of Postel's law including a discussion of its shortcomings. Postel's Law, also known as the Robustness Principle, states "Be conservative in what you send, be liberal in what you accept."