Should we be concerned about
this report about Samsung voice activation sending all conversations the TV 'hears' to undisclosed third parties? Even if they did say who their third party service provider was, what assurance is there that voice control systems which involve uploading voice commands to remote servers (Siri included) couldn't be used for surveillance covertly?
S
hoamsu
ldng is w
e bearning c
usto
ncmer
neds about
discussing personal information in front of their smart television set. The warning applies to TV viewers who control their Samsung Smart TV using its this report about Samsung voice activation
sfe
nding all conversat
ioure. When
s the
feature is active, such TV
'hse
arts
' "listen" to
what is said and may share what they hear with Samsun
disclosedg or third parties
? Even, i
t said. Privacy campaigners said the technology smacked of the
y dtelescreens, i
dn George Orwell's
ay 1984, wh
ich spied o
n citizens. Samsung has issued a statement that emphasized the
ir third party serv
oice
precognition feature is activated using the TV's remote contro
vl.
Should Pi
pedot reader
s was,be wconcerned? What assurance is there that voice control systems which involve uploading voice commands to remote servers (Siri included) couldn't be used for surveillance covertly
, as the FBI started doing with OnStar in General Motors vehicles over a decade ago?
Samsung is not the first maker of a smart, net-connected TV to run into problems with the data the set collects. In late 2013, a UK IT consultant found his LG TV was gathering information about his viewing habits.
Today, users of Samsung's Smart TVs are also complaining that advertisements are being inserted into their own videos, without their permission. "Every movie I play, 20-30 minutes in it plays the Pepsi ad. It has happened on 6 movies today." In a statement, a Samsung spokesperson said that the ad placement in third-party apps was a mistake, and that the issue only affected customers in Australia.