Twitter under fire for failing to deal with horrific trolls

by
in internet on (#3VP)
Maybe humans are just intrinsically jerks. Or some of them. Or maybe jerks are attracted to the Internet to do their dirty work. Who knows. What's indisputable is that a lot of unpleasant people have wound up on Twitter and Twitter has roundly failed to effectively control them. This has made headlines again in the shadow of actor Robin Williams' suicide, as his daughter Zelda has announced she is leaving Twitter due to the extraordinary abuse she endured there.

The Atlantic has posted a good piece on the subject, declaring "As it considers revising its rules on abuse, the company must decide which users it really values." And quick, too. Twitter's market value is stagnant and the platform's founders are struggling to figure out ways to make Twitter a newly dynamic, vital site to which advertisers will flock. Letting the world think participating on its site exposes you to this kind of unchecked abuse isn't going to help. From the Atlantic:
Twitter, though, has structured its architecture for reporting abuse particularly poorly: It effectively rewards abusers while discouraging support, solidarity, and intervention for their victims. ... Every platform has values and regulation built into its very structure, built by human designers who make choices about which values to promote and which to inhibit. ... Mass abuse happens fast, and targeted users can drown in a sea of abuse within minutes: The journalist Caroline Criado-Perez received one rape threat per minute after daring to suggest that a woman be featured on British currency.
Your move, Twitter.

Re: Seriously? (Score: 0)

by Anonymous Coward on 2014-08-16 12:59 (#3WQ)

I think you're missing my point. Code and related technology changes are easy; that's what Google does well. But real forum moderation takes HUMANS, and there's no way a huge free platform like Twitta can pay enough good moderators to use actual good judgment to intelligently and selectively moderate the thousands of messages per second that pass through it in real time. It's a MUCH larger problem than gradually updated Usenet.

Even Google has famously failed (or refused) for over a decade to intelligently moderate the cesspool that us YouTube.

Unpaid volunteer moderators are one way to go, but that brings its own set of cliquey power mad issues a la Wikipedia...
Post Comment
Subject
Comment
Captcha
What is the 3rd number in the list seven, thirty seven and 32?