The hypothetical rescue of the Columbia - and its effects on NASA's future missions

by
in space on (#3EY)
story imageArs Technica writer Lee Hutchinson , who worked for NASA during the Columbia incident , writes about the 2003 destruction of the shuttle Columbia, and the questions asked afterwards. Could the disaster have been anticipated? If so, could a rescue have been performed before the shuttle's incredibly destructive re-entry? The answers to those questions hatched an incredible plan - and changed the way NASA handles shuttle missions to this day. It's worth a read not only for the historical perspective, but also for the account of practical project planning and the immense scope of such an endeavor. He calls it the untold story of the rescue mission that could have been NASA's finest hour .

Re: Historyical footnote only (Score: 3, Interesting)

by paddym@pipedot.org on 2014-02-27 05:02 (#7D)

Those were my thoughts as well. The Columbia crash was a tragedy, but there really wasn't enough information at the time to predict that outcome. It would have been very difficult to remedy had they known for sure. I feel like if they had attempted the rescue with so many corners cut for expediency, they would have most likely lost 2 shuttles instead of one.
Post Comment
Subject
Comment
Captcha
The number of body parts in the list elbow, fruit, leg, lion, coffee and ear is?