data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8903/f890379ff27dade4733fe4370869cadc01120375" alt="story image"
Ars Technica writer
Lee Hutchinson , who worked for NASA during the
Columbia incident , writes about the 2003 destruction of the shuttle Columbia, and the questions asked afterwards. Could the disaster have been anticipated? If so, could a rescue have been performed before the shuttle's incredibly destructive re-entry? The answers to those questions hatched an incredible plan - and changed the way NASA handles shuttle missions to this day. It's worth a read not only for the historical perspective, but also for the account of practical project planning and the immense scope of such an endeavor. He calls it
the untold story of the rescue mission that could have been NASA's finest hour .
Maybe, maybe not. TFA makes it sound like it was feasible because of the launch schedule for Atlantis . In any case, I think this kind of "what we could have done" review could be useful in making safety plans for future missions.