Intel isn't violating anything. If anyone is, it is now (or soon to be) Brad Spengler of Gr-security. Accusing Intel of a copyright violation here is a libel of Spengler. It makes no difference if he retracts that now and claims a trademark violation (of which, again, there is none: no one created a brand new "thing" within the technology trade and called it "GRSecurity")
Spengler was trying to extort intel and others for money. He failed. Now he's attempting to close a derivative work of the linux kernel.
Accusing Intel of a copyright violation here is a libel of Spengler. It makes no difference if he retracts that now and claims a trademark violation (of which, again, there is none: no one created a brand new "thing" within the technology trade and called it "GRSecurity")
Spengler was trying to extort intel and others for money.
He failed. Now he's attempting to close a derivative work of the linux kernel.