Article 16AC9 The Guardian view on energy policy: keeping the lights on is what governments are for | Editorial

The Guardian view on energy policy: keeping the lights on is what governments are for | Editorial

by
Editorial
from on (#16AC9)
George Osborne's fixation with flattering the books is jeopardising much-needed investment in the UK's future power generation

It is a good thing this winter has been so mild: the lights didn't go out. But there will be another potential crisis next winter, and the one after that, as Britain's geriatric coal and nuclear power stations are slowly taken out of production, not least to meet important new obligations to decarbonise electricity supply by 2020. Anyone looking for the catastrophic consequences of failing to invest in a timely way in infrastructure, and fixating instead on borrowing off the books behind the taxpayer's back, need look no further.

This is not the first UK government that has got energy wrong. Tony Blair dithered for nearly 10 years before giving the go-ahead to a new generation of nuclear power, during which time much expertise had wasted away. The plan for a third generation European pressurised reactor (EPR) in Somerset, to be known as Hinkley Point C, was approved five long years ago. But George Osborne's obsession with flattering the books has condemned this questionable and costly project to raising cash on the open market. It involves still unproven technology, EDF - which has the contract to build the new power station - is heavily indebted already. The market doesn't much care to invest despite - or perhaps because - the UK, Chinese and French governments are all heavily involved. According to some reports, two thirds of the funding is yet to be raised.

Continue reading...

rc.img

rc.img

rc.img

a2.img
ach.imga2t.imga2t2.imgmf.gif
External Content
Source RSS or Atom Feed
Feed Location http://feeds.theguardian.com/theguardian/business/economics/rss
Feed Title
Feed Link http://feeds.theguardian.com/
Reply 0 comments