Good Editing (Score: 2, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on 2014-04-29 16:25 (#18X) Just a note from the proud first time submitter here.This is yet another way that the good Pipedot folks (which I assume means Bryan) do a better job than either Slashdot or SN. Rather than slap up my submission, they edited it well, adding a short paragraph with two links (whereas I had only provided the Lifehacker URL) and also leaving an Editor's Note with some interesting background info.Simple stuff, sure, but it's indicative of care and quality, and I appreciate it.Again, though, we've got no article or comment volume to speak of. :( Re: Good Editing (Score: 3, Informative) by zafiro17@pipedot.org on 2014-04-29 16:34 (#190) BTW there are at least 2 or 3 volunteer editors on deck, too. Re: Good Editing (Score: 2, Insightful) by bryan@pipedot.org on 2014-04-29 19:50 (#196) Indeed. I'm very grateful and would like to thank these editors. A quick look at the submission history shows a good overview of who all is helping to edit and publish articles. (Hint: it's not me :P) Re: Good Editing (Score: 1) by zafiro17@pipedot.org on 2014-04-29 21:37 (#198) Wow, having a submission history is pretty cool. Not sure if it's unique? In any case, it is a nice step in the direction of transparency and honesty. Cool technology - well done.
Re: Good Editing (Score: 3, Informative) by zafiro17@pipedot.org on 2014-04-29 16:34 (#190) BTW there are at least 2 or 3 volunteer editors on deck, too. Re: Good Editing (Score: 2, Insightful) by bryan@pipedot.org on 2014-04-29 19:50 (#196) Indeed. I'm very grateful and would like to thank these editors. A quick look at the submission history shows a good overview of who all is helping to edit and publish articles. (Hint: it's not me :P) Re: Good Editing (Score: 1) by zafiro17@pipedot.org on 2014-04-29 21:37 (#198) Wow, having a submission history is pretty cool. Not sure if it's unique? In any case, it is a nice step in the direction of transparency and honesty. Cool technology - well done.
Re: Good Editing (Score: 2, Insightful) by bryan@pipedot.org on 2014-04-29 19:50 (#196) Indeed. I'm very grateful and would like to thank these editors. A quick look at the submission history shows a good overview of who all is helping to edit and publish articles. (Hint: it's not me :P) Re: Good Editing (Score: 1) by zafiro17@pipedot.org on 2014-04-29 21:37 (#198) Wow, having a submission history is pretty cool. Not sure if it's unique? In any case, it is a nice step in the direction of transparency and honesty. Cool technology - well done.
Re: Good Editing (Score: 1) by zafiro17@pipedot.org on 2014-04-29 21:37 (#198) Wow, having a submission history is pretty cool. Not sure if it's unique? In any case, it is a nice step in the direction of transparency and honesty. Cool technology - well done.