Article 2JZQ1 Fighting Falcon puts off retirement: F-16 to fly for USAF through 2048

Fighting Falcon puts off retirement: F-16 to fly for USAF through 2048

by
Sean Gallagher
from Ars Technica - All content on (#2JZQ1)
F-16_CJ_Fighting_Falcon-800x571.jpg

Enlarge (credit: US Air Force)

The last of the gunfighters will not be hanging up its holster any time soon. While the Trump administration has been playing Let's Make a Deal with Lockheed Martin and Boeing over the future of the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, the Department of Defense has decided to extend the life of yet another old warhorse to fill the gap. At least 300 F-16 Fighting Falcons will receive structural and avionics upgrades that will allow them to fly until at least 2048, thanks to a Service Life Extension Program (SLEP) with Lockheed Martin.

The Obama administration had already made plans for the A-10 Thunderbolt to stay in service until 2022 to fill the close air support role and had plotted an upgrade to the F-16 as well since 2012. But the task of pulling the trigger on the F-16 upgrade was left to the Trump administration. "Following F-16 Service Life Extension Program (SLEP) structural modifications, the US Air Force could safely operate [F-16C and D] Block 40-52 aircraft to 2048 and beyond," Air Force officials said in a release.

The F-16 was a product of a push by a group of analysts within the Air Force known as the "Fighter Mafia" for a lightweight fighter-a counterpart to the F-15 Eagle in what was referred to as a "high-low mix" (with the expensive, high-tech F-15 being the "high"). The F-16 was the winner of a "fly-before-buy" bake-off-an approach to procurement that many critics of the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter may be nostalgic for.

Read 6 remaining paragraphs | Comments

index?i=DlUD7lcu5gM:Is7TdTgrnTw:V_sGLiPB index?i=DlUD7lcu5gM:Is7TdTgrnTw:F7zBnMyn index?d=qj6IDK7rITs index?d=yIl2AUoC8zA
External Content
Source RSS or Atom Feed
Feed Location http://feeds.arstechnica.com/arstechnica/index
Feed Title Ars Technica - All content
Feed Link https://arstechnica.com/
Reply 0 comments