IMAX killed it (Score: 2, Interesting) by evilviper@pipedot.org on 2014-11-09 00:57 (#2TYN) I suppose IMAX is to blame... Trying to squeeze more money out of their customers, they introduced "IMAX Digital" so they could show just any regular film nice and cheap, but charge IMAX prices for the ticket. Angering your customers who are paying big bucks and keeping film alive, is a losing propsition. http://welivefilm.com/opinion-imax-digital-vs-cinemark-xd-by-delon-villanueva/ Another negative is the move to 3D. Whether you like 3D or not, it has divided audiences in half... Some won't ever watch a 3D movie, others won't pay to watch the regular 2D versions anymore.But I suppose as long as IMAX and Cinemark XD are able to demand huge ticket prices, and fill their theatres, film won't be going away just yet. Re: IMAX killed it (Score: 2, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on 2014-11-09 14:43 (#2TYQ) IMAX didn't kill film. Film is *expensive* and *heavy* and a huge pain in the ass to do anything with. Don't get me wrong, I love film, I was a projectionist for 4 years while in college, but I can tell you from plenty of first hand experience how much of a giant pain in the ass it is to do anything with film. Just to show a single movie I would need to put in probably about one "running length" of time before the movie even started to prep the film. Compare to a digital set up where you just go download an press a button. It's no big surprise that's winning out over film.For what it's worth, I saw Interstellar yesterday in 35mm at a local theater (no one is showing 70mm IMAX around :() and I thought it looked great, much better than many of the digital movies I've seen lately. Real film lent a grittiness to the movie that meshed well with the story and desperation and it would be impossible to replicate that with digital. Of course, it also sucked when the sound cut out for 30 seconds during one scene because there was no way to rewind it, but oh well. Re: IMAX killed it (Score: 1) by evilviper@pipedot.org on 2014-11-10 03:04 (#2TYS) Real film lent a grittiness to the movie that meshed well with the story and desperation and it would be impossible to replicate that with digital.Impossible to replicate? Are you daft? You could easily transfer a digital print to film, then digitize the film... And that's the hard way. Easy way is to push the button on your digital processing suite that says "film grain". Re: IMAX killed it (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on 2014-11-10 06:13 (#2TYV) I know who I think is daft...
Re: IMAX killed it (Score: 2, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on 2014-11-09 14:43 (#2TYQ) IMAX didn't kill film. Film is *expensive* and *heavy* and a huge pain in the ass to do anything with. Don't get me wrong, I love film, I was a projectionist for 4 years while in college, but I can tell you from plenty of first hand experience how much of a giant pain in the ass it is to do anything with film. Just to show a single movie I would need to put in probably about one "running length" of time before the movie even started to prep the film. Compare to a digital set up where you just go download an press a button. It's no big surprise that's winning out over film.For what it's worth, I saw Interstellar yesterday in 35mm at a local theater (no one is showing 70mm IMAX around :() and I thought it looked great, much better than many of the digital movies I've seen lately. Real film lent a grittiness to the movie that meshed well with the story and desperation and it would be impossible to replicate that with digital. Of course, it also sucked when the sound cut out for 30 seconds during one scene because there was no way to rewind it, but oh well. Re: IMAX killed it (Score: 1) by evilviper@pipedot.org on 2014-11-10 03:04 (#2TYS) Real film lent a grittiness to the movie that meshed well with the story and desperation and it would be impossible to replicate that with digital.Impossible to replicate? Are you daft? You could easily transfer a digital print to film, then digitize the film... And that's the hard way. Easy way is to push the button on your digital processing suite that says "film grain". Re: IMAX killed it (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on 2014-11-10 06:13 (#2TYV) I know who I think is daft...
Re: IMAX killed it (Score: 1) by evilviper@pipedot.org on 2014-11-10 03:04 (#2TYS) Real film lent a grittiness to the movie that meshed well with the story and desperation and it would be impossible to replicate that with digital.Impossible to replicate? Are you daft? You could easily transfer a digital print to film, then digitize the film... And that's the hard way. Easy way is to push the button on your digital processing suite that says "film grain". Re: IMAX killed it (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on 2014-11-10 06:13 (#2TYV) I know who I think is daft...
Re: IMAX killed it (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on 2014-11-10 06:13 (#2TYV) I know who I think is daft...