Leaseholds are not the problem – abuse of them is | Editorial
The abuse of leaseholds (Editorial, 26 July) is exactly that: abuse. There is nothing intrinsically wrong with leasehold/freehold arrangements in the hands of responsible (and preferably regulated) landlords. It's worth thinking why they were invented and have endured for centuries. They are a highly effective way of allocating capital, risk and reward in the use of land and buildings; they are still much used in commercial property transactions for that purpose. By contrast, private finance initiatives and similar arrangements are designed primarily to make money for all the intermediaries in a set of parasitical financial relationships, all of which could have been structured just as well and more cheaply with leases.
This scandal simply shows how normal it has become to expect to "earn" totally exploitative rewards, without risk or commensurate investment. This is just more evidence of the damaging commodification of land, and how, since financial deregulation, global capital flows graze effortlessly on our local housing markets for the risk-free excess profits they so willingly give up. The economist Martin Wolf rightly calls this "the greatest misallocation of resources imaginable".
Continue reading...