Article 32SJF Uber really doesn’t want its drivers to be considered employees

Uber really doesn’t want its drivers to be considered employees

by
Cyrus Farivar
from Ars Technica - All content on (#32SJF)
GettyImages-618790254-800x532.jpg

Enlarge (credit: DANIEL SORABJI/AFP/Getty Images)

SAN FRANCISCO-A three-judge panel at the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals appeared to lean in favor of Uber in a case that could have a profound impact on the future of employment and gig economy startups.

On Wednesday, the court heard a consolidated appeal of 11 pending cases that essentially boil down to the same issue: should drivers be considered employees? If so, can they sue as part of a class-action lawsuit? If Uber prevails, drivers will be considered contractors-and they won't, as is currently the case, receive numerous benefits.

When prospective drivers sign up with Uber, they agree to waive their right to sue in favor of arbitration, a private, quasi-legal process that generally favors corporations over individuals.

Read 15 remaining paragraphs | Comments

index?i=Urb9vzTWZVc:cGIBL1ogTDE:V_sGLiPB index?i=Urb9vzTWZVc:cGIBL1ogTDE:F7zBnMyn index?d=qj6IDK7rITs index?d=yIl2AUoC8zA
External Content
Source RSS or Atom Feed
Feed Location http://feeds.arstechnica.com/arstechnica/index
Feed Title Ars Technica - All content
Feed Link https://arstechnica.com/
Reply 0 comments