The Guardian view on Corbyn’s speech: his best yet | Editorial
It is remarkable what a difference a single election can make. Even if you lose. Jeremy Corbyn delivered his third - and best - speech as Labour leader to a party giddy with optimism. By reducing the Tories to minority government and increasing Labour's vote by the biggest amount since 1945, Mr Corbyn has transformed gloom to cheer. That the Labour leader has done so from the left is a vindication of his brand of "modern, progressive socialist" politics. Mr Corbyn's attachment to socialism is important: since the 1990s Labour leaders have avoided mentioning the word, which they viewed as being synonymous with the then unpopular notions of state control and higher taxes. They preferred instead to declare their loyalty to democratic socialist "values". Values are less controversial than policies. Values can be shared, whereas policies divide. However, Mr Corbyn's speech was peppered with plans to intervene in markets where vested interests, represented by the Conservative party, have conspired against the multitude. The Labour leader wants to distinguish his party from the thinking of the last four decades, arguing for a "new model of economic management to replace the failed dogmas of neoliberalism". His contention is that the party is now electable because of socialism, not despite it.
This is stirring stuff. There's little doubt that Mr Corbyn spoke to the passions of the party, but did he speak to the preoccupations of the wider electorate? His diagnosis is founded on unquestionable truths: that an era of deregulation, privatisation and low taxes for the wealthy came tumbling down with the global financial crisis. Bankers played a leading role in the crisis, but it's the rest of society that has paid for the crash. This has had profound consequences: most notably class divisions have been politically revived. "Them and us" economics is rooted in the fact the top 1% of society has recovered all the ground it lost while the average worker faces the longest period of falling real-terms pay since the Napoleonic wars. It's difficult to sell capitalism to those with no capital.
Continue reading...