Article 33X54 Supreme Court won’t hear Kim Dotcom’s civil forfeiture case

Supreme Court won’t hear Kim Dotcom’s civil forfeiture case

by
Cyrus Farivar
from Ars Technica - All content on (#33X54)
GettyImages-455571510-800x533.jpg

Enlarge / Kim Dotcom, founder of Megaupload, seen here on Monday, Sept. 15, 2014. (credit: Brendon O'Hagan/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Kim Dotcom's civil forfeiture case will not be heard before the Supreme Court this term, America's highest court ruled on Monday.

The civil forfeiture case was brought 18 months after 2012 American criminal charges related to alleged copyright infringement against Dotcom and his now-shuttered company, Megaupload. In the forfeiture case, prosecutors specifically outlined why the New Zealand seizure of Dotcom's assets on behalf of the American government was valid. Seized items include millions of dollars in various seized bank accounts in Hong Kong and New Zealand, the Dotcom mansion, several luxury cars, four jet skis, two 108-inch TVs, three 82-inch TVs, a $10,000 watch, and a photograph by Olaf Mueller worth over $100,000.

Since Dotcom was arrested in January 2012, he has successfully resisted extradition to the United States and remains in New Zealand free on bail.

Read 6 remaining paragraphs | Comments

index?i=adf2Qbay7Ew:zbLYlwKBbnc:V_sGLiPB index?i=adf2Qbay7Ew:zbLYlwKBbnc:F7zBnMyn index?d=qj6IDK7rITs index?d=yIl2AUoC8zA
External Content
Source RSS or Atom Feed
Feed Location http://feeds.arstechnica.com/arstechnica/index
Feed Title Ars Technica - All content
Feed Link https://arstechnica.com/
Reply 0 comments