Article 3ZJN4 A good announcement and a bad announcement for two nuclear-energy startups

A good announcement and a bad announcement for two nuclear-energy startups

by
Megan Geuss
from Ars Technica - All content on (#3ZJN4)
XB7S7PXFXJHGBPKK5DVF53A7DQ-800x450.jpg

Enlarge / Mockup of the NuScale energy plant slated for development outside of Idaho Falls, Idaho. (credit: NuScale Power)

The benefits of nuclear energy-dispatchable power with zero emissions (excluding emissions from uranium mining)-are desperately needed in a world facing climate change. The disadvantages of nuclear energy are also great. The old light-water reactors that serve America's grid today create nuclear waste that's politically impossible to dispose of. Nuclear plants with traditional reactors are also extremely expensive to build and difficult to permit.

For these reasons, many nuclear hopefuls have looked to advanced nuclear technology. Several startups have popped up, promising to make either the waste problem or the expense problem go away.

This week, two advanced nuclear-technology startups have announced major news, both good and bad for the future of advanced nuclear technology.

Read 10 remaining paragraphs | Comments

index?i=X1t9fzpLxeo:Boi1x29jxzU:V_sGLiPB index?i=X1t9fzpLxeo:Boi1x29jxzU:F7zBnMyn index?d=qj6IDK7rITs index?d=yIl2AUoC8zA
External Content
Source RSS or Atom Feed
Feed Location http://feeds.arstechnica.com/arstechnica/index
Feed Title Ars Technica - All content
Feed Link https://arstechnica.com/
Reply 0 comments