Article 4T0QQ Robo-tank? Army picks contenders for robotic combat vehicle competition

Robo-tank? Army picks contenders for robotic combat vehicle competition

by
Sean Gallagher
from Ars Technica - All content on (#4T0QQ)
robotank-800x422.jpeg

Enlarge / Meet RoboTank, your future tank platoon mate. (credit: Textron)

On October 18, the National Advanced Mobility Consortium-an organization of industry and academic researchers contracted by the US government to develop autonomous ground systems for the military-announced the selection of four companies to build prototype light robotic combat vehicles for the US Army. These are "non-developmental" prototypes, meaning they're based on existing technologies that could be turned into deployable systems with relatively minor modifications.

The Robotic Combat Vehicle-Light (RCV-L) program is part of the Army Futures Command's Next Generation Combat Vehicle effort. It seeks to provide soldiers in mechanized infantry and armor units with robotic "wingmen" that extend their reach and effectiveness on the battlefield. The Army hopes to have prototypes of the RCV-L as well as a heavier vehicle (the Robotic Combat Vehicle-Medium) in full testing in 2020. Two of each design will be fielded as "platoons" for testing, with the goal of wide deployment of tankbots by 2028.

Working in concert with new crewed combat vehicles, the robotic vehicles would provide additional sensors and firepower to bring to bear on an enemy in the field. By using robots to make the "first contact" with an enemy, unit commanders would be given more time to make decisions before committing human soldiers to the fight-or at least, that's the doctrinal thinking behind the Army's robotic combat crew goals.

Read 6 remaining paragraphs | Comments

index?i=d89R9werLLc:YHv98QNvies:V_sGLiPB index?i=d89R9werLLc:YHv98QNvies:F7zBnMyn index?d=qj6IDK7rITs index?d=yIl2AUoC8zA
External Content
Source RSS or Atom Feed
Feed Location http://feeds.arstechnica.com/arstechnica/index
Feed Title Ars Technica - All content
Feed Link https://arstechnica.com/
Reply 0 comments