Article 4WZHK Why I dislike what “quantum supremacy” is doing to computing research

Why I dislike what “quantum supremacy” is doing to computing research

by
Chris Lee
from Ars Technica - All content on (#4WZHK)
Screenshot-2019-12-20-at-18.01.39-800x27

Enlarge / This optical setup is not your friend. Many fast switches and delay lines set up to arrange for 20 photons to enter the waveguide circuit simultaneously. (credit: Hui Wang, Hefei national laboratory)

The big quantum buzzword these days is "quantum supremacy." (It's a term I despise, even as I acknowledge that the concept has some utility. I will explain in a moment). Unfortunately, this means that some researchers have focused on quantum supremacy as an end in itself, building useless devices to get there.

Now, optical quantum computers have joined the club with a painstakingly configured device that doesn't quite manage to demonstrate quantum supremacy. But before we get to the news, let's delve into the world of quantum supremacy.

The quest for quantum supremacy

"Quantum supremacy" boils down to a failure of mathematics, combined with a fear that the well will run dry before we've drunk our fill.

Read 14 remaining paragraphs | Comments

index?i=IkTpWjcmins:NBH07vewYE4:V_sGLiPB index?i=IkTpWjcmins:NBH07vewYE4:F7zBnMyn index?d=qj6IDK7rITs index?d=yIl2AUoC8zA
External Content
Source RSS or Atom Feed
Feed Location http://feeds.arstechnica.com/arstechnica/index
Feed Title Ars Technica - All content
Feed Link https://arstechnica.com/
Reply 0 comments