Article 4XP5F Fox executive teases Browncoats with hints of possible Firefly revival

Fox executive teases Browncoats with hints of possible Firefly revival

by
Jennifer Ouellette
from Ars Technica - All content on (#4XP5F)
firefly_cast_reuniting_for_firefly_onlin

Enlarge / The 2002-2003 space western drama was canceled after just one season but remains a cult favorite. (credit: 20th Century Fox Television)

Hope springs eternal, especially if you're a diehard fan of Firefly, the 2002-2003 space western created by Joss Whedon that was canceled by Fox after a single season. But the plucky crew and passengers aboard the Firefly-class spaceship Serenity live on in the hearts of self-styled Browncoats everywhere. Heck, NASA astronaut Steven Swanson loved the show (and the 2005 spin-off film Serenity) so much that he took the DVDs with him on a Space Shuttle Atlantis mission in 2007. So it's not surprising that an off-hand comment by a Fox executive has renewed rumors of a possible revival.

This latest round of revival chatter started when Firefly's former showrunner Tim Minear recently tweeted out an old photo from the last day of shooting on Firefly, just as Fox entertainment president Michael Thorn was doing a press junket for the Television Critics Association. So naturally the question came up.

"The macro answer is, any time we look at one of our classic titles, if there's a way to reinvent it for today so it's as resonant now as the original was, and is, to the fans, we're wide open," Thorn told The Wrap. "In this crowded marketplace, if you can start with some kind of brand awareness and IP that has a vocal support and, in this case, a crazy, passionate love for it, you're ahead of the game."

Read 5 remaining paragraphs | Comments

index?i=tmhgQPbB-Fc:3EkLZDPMNOg:V_sGLiPB index?i=tmhgQPbB-Fc:3EkLZDPMNOg:F7zBnMyn index?d=qj6IDK7rITs index?d=yIl2AUoC8zA
External Content
Source RSS or Atom Feed
Feed Location http://feeds.arstechnica.com/arstechnica/index
Feed Title Ars Technica - All content
Feed Link https://arstechnica.com/
Reply 0 comments