Article 5A1P2 What using AT&T’s 768kbps DSL is like in 2020—yes, it’s awful

What using AT&T’s 768kbps DSL is like in 2020—yes, it’s awful

by
Jon Brodkin
from Ars Technica - All content on (#5A1P2)
getty-snail-mouse-internet-800x500.jpg

Enlarge (credit: Getty Images | Synergee)

Millions of Americans live in broadband deserts with no access to anything resembling modern Internet service. But few people have it as bad as those who must rely on AT&T's ancient DSL network.

Kathie McNamee of Raymond, Mississippi is one of those unlucky AT&T DSL customers. McNamee said she pays AT&T $35 a month for an up-to-768kbps Internet plan that rarely works well enough to be usable for her, her husband, and two teenage sons. McNamee contacted Ars after reading a story about AT&T incorrectly claiming that certain homes in Mississippi had access to broadband when in fact AT&T isn't capable of providing service to those addresses.

AT&T has received over $283 million from the Federal Communications Commission since 2015 to extend home-Internet service to over 133,000 potential customer locations in Mississippi. AT&T says it will exceed that requirement by the end-of-2020 deadline, but the company's mapping mistakes have led to unpleasant surprises for customers who thought they'd get modern broadband.

Read 29 remaining paragraphs | Comments

index?i=3Cb2Qf_4E6c:jKBz1gU6xeQ:V_sGLiPB index?i=3Cb2Qf_4E6c:jKBz1gU6xeQ:F7zBnMyn index?d=qj6IDK7rITs index?d=yIl2AUoC8zA
External Content
Source RSS or Atom Feed
Feed Location http://feeds.arstechnica.com/arstechnica/index
Feed Title Ars Technica - All content
Feed Link https://arstechnica.com/
Reply 0 comments