Has Covid changed the price of a life?
A pandemic is a moral and economic minefield. How should governments weigh up the difficult choices - and are they getting it right?
The dilemmas are achingly familiar by now. Should we lock down or stay open? If we lock down, when and in what order should the different sectors of the economy open up? What about schools? Places of worship? Cultural and sporting venues?
In each case, the question being asked is essentially the same: is saving x lives from Covid-19 worth y potential damage to society? The question is usually framed in terms of damage to the economy rather than damage to society, because the former is easier to measure (how do you measure the damage done to religious people of not being able to pray together, to schoolchildren of not being able to mix, or to any of us of being deprived of art?) That calculation is complex enough, but feeding into it is another that's even more morally fraught: are some human lives more valuable than others?
Asked whether they'd give the last seat in a lifeboat to a healthy child or a sickly old man, most would pick the child
People came to realise that certain choices are unconscionable in a wealthy society
This article was amended on 15 February 2021. An earlier version referred incorrectly to Churchill having declared war on Germany.
Continue reading...