Article 5V90G Researchers date the oldest known human skull at 233,000 years

Researchers date the oldest known human skull at 233,000 years

by
Kiona N. Smith
from Ars Technica - All content on (#5V90G)
Omo-I-image-1-800x600.jpg

Enlarge (credit: Vidal et al 2022)

The oldest known Homo sapiens fossil is about 36,000 years older than previously thought, according to a recent study. Volcanologists matched a layer of ash above the fossil skull to an eruption of southern Ethiopia's Shala volcano 233,000 years ago. Their findings seem to line up well with other recent research about when our species' branch of the family tree split from that of our nearest hominin relatives, the ancestors of the now-extinct Neanderthals and Denisovans.

Geochemical fingerprints on a Pleistocene crime scene

Finding the oldest member of our species hasn't been easy for paleoanthropologists. There's only a handful of sites in Africa where early Homo sapiens fossils-anything older than about 100,000 years-have turned up, and some of the samples have been nearly impossible to pin a precise date on. At other sites, the fossils don't quite have all the features that distinguish our skulls from those of our now-extinct hominin cousins: things like a high, round cranium (the round part of your skull that holds your brain) and a chin.

One fossil, a skull found near the Omo River in southern Ethiopia, does have all the hallmarks of anatomically modern humans; among other traits, Omo I has a chin and a tall cranium. The skull was buried (probably not on purpose) in a layer of sediment that was later covered by ash from at least one volcanic eruption. In theory, that ash should make it easy to measure the fossil's minimum age.

Read 14 remaining paragraphs | Comments

index?i=C7NKRBeMcZw:gbabAsOCNGo:V_sGLiPB index?i=C7NKRBeMcZw:gbabAsOCNGo:F7zBnMyn index?d=qj6IDK7rITs index?d=yIl2AUoC8zA
External Content
Source RSS or Atom Feed
Feed Location http://feeds.arstechnica.com/arstechnica/index
Feed Title Ars Technica - All content
Feed Link https://arstechnica.com/
Reply 0 comments