ChatGPT Can’t be Credited as an Author, Says World’s Largest Academic Publisher
fliptop writes:
But Springer Nature, which publishes thousands of scientific journals, says it has no problem with AI being used to help write research - as long as its use is properly disclosed:
Springer Nature, the world's largest academic publisher, has clarified its policies on the use of AI writing tools in scientific papers. The companyannounced this week that software like ChatGPT can't be credited as an author in papers published in its thousands of journals. However, Springer says it has no problem with scientists using AI to help write or generate ideas for research, as long as this contribution is properly disclosed by the authors.
"We felt compelled to clarify our position: for our authors, for our editors, and for ourselves," Magdalena Skipper, editor-in-chief of Springer Nature's flagship publication, Nature, tells The Verge. "This new generation of LLM tools - including ChatGPT - has really exploded into the community, which is rightly excited and playing with them, but [also] using them in ways that go beyond how they can genuinely be used at present."
[...] Skipper says that banning AI tools in scientific work would be ineffective. "I think we can safely say that outright bans of anything don't work," she says. Instead, she says, the scientific community - including researchers, publishers, and conference organizers - needs to come together to work out new norms for disclosure and guardrails for safety.
Originally spotted on The Eponymous Pickle.
Read more of this story at SoylentNews.