Article 6C0W1 Motorola makes its 4th-gen foldable, the Moto Razr+, official

Motorola makes its 4th-gen foldable, the Moto Razr+, official

by
Ron Amadeo
from Ars Technica - All content on (#6C0W1)
  • 16-980x789.jpg

    The 2023 Moto Razr+ (or Moto Razr 40 Ultra internationally). [credit: Motorola ]

After endless leaks, Motorola made its fourth-generation lineup of foldables official today. The flagship is the Moto Razr+, which will launch in the US on June 23 for $999. There's also a cheaper phone, called only the "Moto Razr," which has a smaller outside screen, slower SoC, and no clear US price or release date. Internationally, these phones are called the Moto Razr 40 Ultra and Moto Razr 40.

The Ultra model's SoC is a Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1-that's not the best you can get from Qualcomm, which would be the 8 Gen 2-this is a year-old mid-cycle-upgrade chip. The phone has 8GB of RAM, 256GB of storage, and a 3800 mAh battery with 30 W quick charging. The leaked display specs have been all over the place, but officially, the interior display is a 6.9-inch, 2640*1080 OLED that runs at a smoking 165 Hz. The exterior display is super big on the Ultra model and is a 3.6-inch, 144 Hz OLED at a nearly square 1066*1056. Motorola has the phone's dust and water ingress protection rated at IP52, which typically only protects it from "direct sprays of water up to 15 degrees from the vertical" and is far from qualifying the Razr as a water-resistant phone.

The design has been better. The original foldable Moto Razr reboot from 2020 had beautiful throwback looks that screamed "Moto Razr." It looked just like the old-school flip phone from the early 2000s but modernized. This fourth foldable generation tones things down a lot and is more of a generic rectangle. You could easily confuse it for Samsung's Galaxy Z Flip.

Read 6 remaining paragraphs | Comments

External Content
Source RSS or Atom Feed
Feed Location http://feeds.arstechnica.com/arstechnica/index
Feed Title Ars Technica - All content
Feed Link https://arstechnica.com/
Reply 0 comments