Sunak says infected blood inquiry report marks a ‘day of shame for British state’ and offers ‘unequivocal apology’ – UK politics live
PM apologises following report that found subtle, pervasive and chilling' cover-up by NHS and government. This live blog is closed
GB News has described the Ofcom ruling against it today (see 10.51am and 11.01am) as an alarming development" that should terrify" anyone who believes in a free media. Here is its response to the judgment in full.
Ofcom's finding against GB News today is an alarming development in its attempt to silence us by standing in the way of a forum that allows the public to question politicians directly.
The regulator's threat to punish a news organisation with sanctions for enabling people to challenge their own prime minister strikes at the heart of democracy at a time when it could not be more vital.
In considering whether the programme was duly impartial, we took into account a range of factors, such as: the audience's questions to the prime minister; the prime minister's responses; the presenter's contribution; and whether due impartiality was preserved through clearly linked and timely programmes. Our investigation found, in summary, that:
-while some of the audience's questions provided some challenge to, and criticism of, the government's policies and performance, audience members were not able to challenge the prime minister's responses and the presenter did not do this to any meaningful extent;
Given the very high compliance risks this programme presented, we found GB News's approach to compliance to be wholly insufficient, and consider it could have, and should have, taken additional steps to mitigate these risks.
We found that an appropriately wide range of significant viewpoints were not presented and given due weight in the People's Forum: The Prime Minister, nor was due impartiality preserved through clearly linked and timely programmes. As a result, we consider that the prime minister had a mostly uncontested platform to promote the policies and performance of his government in a period preceding a UK general election.
Continue reading...