Fresh hostilities in Gulf suggest US-Iran memorandum was too broadly worded
by Patrick Wintour from World news | The Guardian on (#76M8Q)
Document appears to have been subject to conflicting interpretations on key issues of Lebanon ceasefire and strait of Hormuz
The sudden eruption of fresh hostilities in the Gulf - just 10 days after Iran and the US signed a memorandum of understanding to end the conflict - threatens to put the two countries back on the path to war.
It appears the deliberately opaque wording in the memorandum has been unable to withstand the pressure of conflicting interpretations, and as a result supporters of the deal inside Tehran are on the back foot. Statements to the effect that Iran's government should never have agreed to reopen the strait of Hormuz are proliferating - and not just among the country's hardliners.
Continue reading...