US Senator's Attempt to Mandate an "AI Kill Switch" is Rejected
Anonymous Coward writes:
https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2026/09/16/congress/paul-kills-kill-switch-bill-01081348:
Sen. Rand Paul blocked an attempt by fellow Republican Sen. John Kennedy to quickly pass legislation that would require companies to build a "kill switch" into their artificial intelligence model.
Kennedy, of Louisiana, went to the Senate floor Wednesday to try to pass his bill without holding a formal vote - a step that can be prevented by any one of his 99 colleagues. He argued that the measure was effectively a short-term step, with Congress unlikely to pass more sweeping AI legislation in the immediate future even amid fears that technological advancements could spiral out of human control.
"We are not going to get up off our ice-cold lazy butts and address this anytime soon," Kennedy said about Congress' inability to pass a more comprehensive bill. "But still we've got this risk out there that we know is real of one of these models becoming the Terminator."
Paul, however, blocked Kennedy's request to pass the bill through a unanimous consent agreement, saying from the Senate floor, "I think we should have as many facts as possible before we dictate rules for the whole economy.
"I don't oppose the spirit of this bill, but I do ask that we make sure that we have all the information," the Kentucky lawmaker added.
Paul tried to amend Kennedy's bill to establish a group that could make recommendations on AI guardrail policies to the Senate Commerce Committee. Kennedy rejected that suggestion.
"My mama didn't raise a fool," he said, adding that "a committee is a way to kill this."
Are model "guardrails" even possible in principle? How would a "kill switch" be implemented if it is part of the model, where the model could just choose to ignore it?
Read more of this story at SoylentNews.