Why denying refugees the right to work is a catastrophic error | Paul Collier and Alexander Betts

It's not just fleeing conflict that makes victims out of refugees - it's also denying them the means to become autonomous and productive

From the 1980s on, a dominant international approach has been taken towards the majority of the world's refugees. Concentrated in a small number of host countries, close to war zones, displaced people have been settled in what have become known as "humanitarian silos". Such places are usually remote, arid, dangerous and almost always have strict prohibitions on socio-economic activity. They are designed to deal only with the emergency phase of refugee intake, and yet the model has endured, leaving individuals and families stranded for years at a time.

This strategy undermines autonomy and dignity. It also erodes human potential by focusing almost exclusively on people's vulnerabilities, rather than on rebuilding their lives. Inevitably, many of those directly affected by it become disillusioned and choose to move on, gravitating towards urban areas in the host nation or risking their lives crossing oceans to other countries.

Related: Refugee camps are not the answer to a complex crisis

Related: Innovation at Zaatari: how do refugees make tents and caravans into homes?

Related: Syrian refugees in Jordan: 'If they cut the coupons, we will probably die'