Article 34V0Y Vivoactive 3 review: Garmin’s often the underdog, often the better choice

Vivoactive 3 review: Garmin’s often the underdog, often the better choice

by
Valentina Palladino
from Ars Technica - All content on (#34V0Y)

(video link)

The fight to make the best all-purpose smartwatch has never been tougher. There are a number of new wearables around the $300 mark that want to be your device of choice for both fitness and all-day wear. Since fitness is still the most practical use for wearables, most companies follow the same pattern: make the best fitness device for the money and supplement it with other smart features that would be most useful to the masses.

Garmin's latest attempt to execute that plan is the $300 Vivoactive 3, a device poised to take on the $329 Apple Watch Series 3 (without LTE) and the $300 Fitbit Ionic. It has serious fitness chops-as most would expect from a Garmin device-as well as a bunch of typical smartwatch features. The stakes are high for Garmin, given the Vivoactive's price and its competition: the device must give users the best value for their money by being both a solid fitness watch and smart device, while also being unique enough to persuade prospective users away from similar devices. Some of the Vivoactive 3's fitness and smartwatch features are Garmin signatures (and can be found on other Garmin devices), but others are features necessary to keep up with the Joneses in the wearable space.

Read 53 remaining paragraphs | Comments

index?i=78UZACy0TRo:9NSnUiWtQMQ:V_sGLiPB index?i=78UZACy0TRo:9NSnUiWtQMQ:F7zBnMyn index?d=qj6IDK7rITs index?d=yIl2AUoC8zA
External Content
Source RSS or Atom Feed
Feed Location http://feeds.arstechnica.com/arstechnica/index
Feed Title Ars Technica - All content
Feed Link https://arstechnica.com/
Reply 0 comments