Article 3F7YN Uber doesn’t want jury to see report, but judge says Uber is “stuck” with it

Uber doesn’t want jury to see report, but judge says Uber is “stuck” with it

by
Cyrus Farivar
from Ars Technica - All content on (#3F7YN)
GettyImages-453253488-800x534.jpg

Enlarge (credit: Bloomberg/Getty Images)

SAN FRANCISCO-On the second day of the Waymo v. Uber trade secrets trial, US District Judge William Alsup ruled in favor of Waymo, allowing an internal due diligence report to stand.

Late Monday, several hours after the first day's trial, in court filings, Uber lawyers asked the judge to exclude a slew of materials and deposition testimony that was made public for the first time on Monday evening, arguing that they constituted inadmissible "hearsay."

Among others, these items include drafts and notes that eventually formed the due diligence report that Uber commissioned after a star self-driving engineer, Anthony Levandowski, abruptly left Google in January 2016. Several months later, Levandowski's company, Ottomotto, was acquired by Uber for $680 million.

Read 9 remaining paragraphs | Comments

index?i=aDlVPFzlKkM:ZS9iD1EKTJA:V_sGLiPB index?i=aDlVPFzlKkM:ZS9iD1EKTJA:F7zBnMyn index?d=qj6IDK7rITs index?d=yIl2AUoC8zA
External Content
Source RSS or Atom Feed
Feed Location http://feeds.arstechnica.com/arstechnica/index
Feed Title Ars Technica - All content
Feed Link https://arstechnica.com/
Reply 0 comments