Article 3T4J2 Why Curie’s no Einstein: A subtle gender bias in science

Why Curie’s no Einstein: A subtle gender bias in science

by
John Timmer
from Ars Technica - All content on (#3T4J2)
a3500_einstein2_g.jpg

Enlarge / Who's this? If your answer didn't include "Albert," you're pretty typical. (credit: Columbia University)

When we talk about the most famous scientists, we're often on a last name basis. For figures like Darwin and Einstein, first names and even titles like "professor" seem irrelevant. We know who they are, and a single name is enough to conjure up all they accomplished.

But can you think of any female scientists where the same is true? A new study suggests that using a scientist's surname may be helping perpetuate a bias against female scientists. A variety of studies show that people are more likely to refer to males only by their last name. And a separate set of experiments indicate that people will attach more prestige to anyone deemed worth of being referred to by their last name.

True in politics and science

The studies were performed by Stav Atir and Melissa Ferguson of Cornell. The first set asked a relatively simple question: is there any evidence of a gender bias in referring to people by their last name?

Read 11 remaining paragraphs | Comments

index?i=4I0-7iHORr4:3UjYRq6XFLk:V_sGLiPB index?i=4I0-7iHORr4:3UjYRq6XFLk:F7zBnMyn index?d=qj6IDK7rITs index?d=yIl2AUoC8zA
External Content
Source RSS or Atom Feed
Feed Location http://feeds.arstechnica.com/arstechnica/index
Feed Title Ars Technica - All content
Feed Link https://arstechnica.com/
Reply 0 comments